Roman's strategy for combine() capability

[IanMayo]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #30 into develop will decrease coverage by 2.12%.
The diff coverage is 17.64%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop      #30      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    96.58%   94.45%   -2.13%     
===========================================
  Files           12       10       -2     
  Lines          586      379     -207     
===========================================
- Hits           566      358     -208     
- Misses          20       21       +1

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
data_highlight/support/line.py	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
data_highlight/highlighter.py	78.68% <13.33%> (-21.32%)	⬇️
data_highlight/support/token.py	96.42% <50%> (+10.71%)	⬆️
data_highlight/support/char_array.py	100% <0%> (ø)	⬆️
test/test_Combine.py
data_highlight/support/combine.py
test/test_Splitting.py	98.38% <0%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
... and 2 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 12dab24...b8a1bc0. Read the comment docs.

[IanMayo]

Thanks for that @Romucmad - I've been quite relaxed about type checking. Maybe this is a case where it's justified. Other than that, my approach was similar to yours, though I found that extend() adds the individual items to the other array, rather than adding the whole list:

Oh, I also avoided modifying the first token - so it can still be used to highlight where just it has been used. If we have Date and Time tokens, we may combine them for some one parser for this file, and we may wish to leave them separate for another parser on this file.