-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
implements concordance_index for regression evaluation #2263
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for contribution!
I just commented the docstring for the return value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hsjang001205 Looks good! Almost ready to merge in. Have one minor request about adding this to the docs and we should be good to merge in
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Feel free to merge when ready :)
I merge in. This is because this PR touch docs, so the conflict will happen if my #2257 merge ahead. |
Similar to AUC in regression. Evaluate values for distributed differences, not accuracy.
As an example, if the IC50 value for drug A and B is each 30 and 40, the predicted value for A should be lower than B.
It is a value of whether there is a significant distributional difference with the ranking information.
(often used in clinical data.)
(Lifelines provides more extended functions, so it would be a good idea to consider that.)