New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependency resolution for azure-core
failing due to transitive depdendencies
#3012
Comments
@ZanSara could you help out here? This might be a known issue but I am unsure 😊 |
Hello @tanertopal, thank you for this report. So, we had issues in the past that lead us to the inclusion of a pin to Lines 71 to 77 in 408d8e6
However, re-reading the reasoning of the comment and your issue, I realize the pin might be better added to the TL;DR: I will open a PR shortly and ask you to test if you can lock your dependencies using that branch. |
Hey @tanertopal, please checkout #3022 and let me know if it helps. If we merge this PR this week it will be included in the next Haystack release on Monday 😊 |
@ZanSara, I tried it out and its works and resolves my issue! Thank you for the fast turnaround! |
Great, thanks for checking so quickly! It will be in master soon. |
Describe the bug
I am using Bazel with
rules_python
to generate a lock file for my dependencies. In the process of generating the lock file, I am encountering which you can see below.farm-haystack
dependents onazure-core<1.23
and some transitive dependencies onazure-core>=1.23
.Is this a known issue or does anyone know a fix?
Error message
Expected behavior
Transitive and direct dependencies should resolve correctly.
Additional context
rules_python
To Reproduce
requirements.txt
with the content:bazel run //third_party/py:requirements.update
Would it help if I created an example project?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: