Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework npm specifiers #120

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023
Merged

Rework npm specifiers #120

merged 12 commits into from
Sep 18, 2023

Conversation

kwhinnery
Copy link
Contributor

Reapply changes from denoland/manual#689

  • Should contain approximately the same content with updated relative links and syntax highlighting
  • Should properly attribute original contributor in git

not-my-profile and others added 12 commits July 3, 2023 14:43
This has the advantage that we can easily display the output
(and it doesn't take as much space as cowsay).
'When doing this' should come directly after the example because
otherwise the reader might be confused what 'this' refers to.
"Deno application" begs the question what that is ... the term is
diffuse since Deno applications can also have NPM dependencies.
More people will be looking for how to use TypeScript types
than people looking for how to run NPM binaries with deno.
* add deprecation message

* remove rest of readme
Co-authored-by: Kevin Whinnery <kevin.whinnery@gmail.com>
@kwhinnery kwhinnery merged commit 109df01 into main Sep 18, 2023
2 checks passed
@kwhinnery kwhinnery deleted the rework_npm_specifiers branch September 21, 2023 22:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants