Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2023. It is now read-only.

Rework npm specifiers #689

Closed

Conversation

not-my-profile
Copy link
Contributor

@not-my-profile not-my-profile commented Jul 3, 2023

Please refer to the individual commit messages for the reasoning behind the changes.

If possible please preserve the commits while merging to make the git log more readable.

The last commit introduces a new "Module resolution" section, if you want to I can split it off into a separate PR.

preview

/cc @dsherret

This has the advantage that we can easily display the output
(and it doesn't take as much space as cowsay).
'When doing this' should come directly after the example because
otherwise the reader might be confused what 'this' refers to.
"Deno application" begs the question what that is ... the term is
diffuse since Deno applications can also have NPM dependencies.
More people will be looking for how to use TypeScript types
than people looking for how to run NPM binaries with deno.
@kwhinnery
Copy link
Contributor

I did roll these changes in - thanks! https://docs.deno.com/runtime/manual/node/npm_specifiers

@not-my-profile
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks Kevin for merging these changes ... however I am seriously displeased by you doing so without any attribution to me whatsoever. And I also think the >340 people that have contributed to this repository should continue to be attributed in the git history in the new repository. See my issue denoland/deno-docs#111.

kwhinnery added a commit to denoland/deno-docs that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
kwhinnery added a commit to denoland/deno-docs that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
kwhinnery added a commit to denoland/deno-docs that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
kwhinnery added a commit to denoland/deno-docs that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2023
* Revert "revert changes from denoland/manual#689 (#116)"

This reverts commit 6616602.

* Revert to a33793d
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants