Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Web Locks API #16566

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

feat: Web Locks API #16566

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

load1n9
Copy link
Contributor

@load1n9 load1n9 commented Nov 8, 2022

No description provided.

@sgwilym
Copy link
Contributor

sgwilym commented Nov 18, 2022

Seems like this is failing on a formatting issue?

@bartlomieju bartlomieju added this to the 1.29 milestone Nov 20, 2022
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ext/weblocks/00_weblocks.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@crowlKats crowlKats changed the title feat(ext/weblocks): tests feat: Web Locks API Nov 30, 2022
@bartlomieju bartlomieju modified the milestones: 1.29, 1.30 Dec 12, 2022
@load1n9
Copy link
Contributor Author

load1n9 commented Dec 19, 2022

sadly I have come to believe that adding web locks now would be a terrible idea. Writing a full weblocks implementation would require a whole system to store data across instances which eventually should be added to deno but adding it just for weblocks seems unnecessary so I believe it would be better to implement some more multithreading features before rewriting the weblocks api

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants