New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow judges to "Correct Issues" from Case Details when they are assigned a hearing #10562
Comments
Someone should investigate and weigh either doing this for judges through Case details, or just doing this through the Hearing Prep worksheet. We had originally planned (now a backlog ticket) to do this on the worksheet, but had de-prioritized because we thought the correct issues link would be there on Case details for judges for hearings. Hearings Tech backlog ticket here: #8870 |
Note: could be good for teams who know queue to do so they can get context on hearings |
@laurjpeterson we're not sure how to prioritize this for the next sprint. can you give us a sense? We think this should be ranked pretty |
Let's feature flag this with @lomaxap not a high priority. |
User story: A judge needs to be able to correct AMA issues in advance of or on the day of the hearing.
This functionality was not deployed prior to checkout to a Judge. An appeal is assigned to a judge in a hearing, but that's prior to checkout for a decision.
Investigate how easy it is to turn the "correct issues" link on for judges/attorneys when they aren't assigned a task.
Idea
appeal.hearing.last.judge
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: