Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow judges to "Correct Issues" from Case Details when they are assigned a hearing #10562

Closed
MeredithStewart opened this issue Apr 25, 2019 · 5 comments · Fixed by #11680
Closed

Comments

@MeredithStewart
Copy link

MeredithStewart commented Apr 25, 2019

User story: A judge needs to be able to correct AMA issues in advance of or on the day of the hearing.

This functionality was not deployed prior to checkout to a Judge. An appeal is assigned to a judge in a hearing, but that's prior to checkout for a decision.

Investigate how easy it is to turn the "correct issues" link on for judges/attorneys when they aren't assigned a task.

Idea

  • When a judge is assigned a hearing, they can see the Correct Issues link
    • use appeal.hearing.last.judge
@MeredithStewart
Copy link
Author

MeredithStewart commented Apr 30, 2019

Someone should investigate and weigh either doing this for judges through Case details, or just doing this through the Hearing Prep worksheet. We had originally planned (now a backlog ticket) to do this on the worksheet, but had de-prioritized because we thought the correct issues link would be there on Case details for judges for hearings. Hearings Tech backlog ticket here: #8870

@lpciferri lpciferri changed the title Can AMA "Correct Issues" be turned on for Judges in support of hearings Allow judges to "Correct Issues" from Case Details when they are assigned a hearing May 13, 2019
@lpciferri
Copy link
Contributor

Note: could be good for teams who know queue to do so they can get context on hearings

@lomaxap
Copy link
Contributor

lomaxap commented Jun 3, 2019

@laurjpeterson we're not sure how to prioritize this for the next sprint. can you give us a sense? We think this should be ranked pretty

@pkarman
Copy link
Contributor

pkarman commented Jul 16, 2019

Let's feature flag this with :allow_judge_edit_issues so that rollout is in the hands of product folks.

@lomaxap not a high priority.

@ferristseng ferristseng self-assigned this Aug 6, 2019
va-bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2019
…1680)

Resolves #10562

### Description

  - Modify appeal request issues policy to allow the assigned judge to edit issues
  - Feature is behind `:allow_judge_edit_issues` feature toggle
  - Fix issue in test that was failing because there was an ambiguous sort order
@ferristseng
Copy link
Contributor

Adding Issues

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 44 31 AM

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 45 06 AM

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 52 02 AM

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 52 24 AM

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 52 32 AM

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 52 55 AM

Removing Issues

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 53 10 AM

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 10 53 21 AM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment