MHV-57328/update-sort-options

[agravell047]

Summary

Created a generic sorting function to handle all sorting of medications for any number of sort options

Related issue(s)

https://jira.devops.va.gov/browse/MHV-57328

Sort criteria:

1. (Default) Sorted Alphabetically by Status > Alphabetical > Last Fill Date: * This is the default sorting option that users will encounter upon accessing their medication list.
   Medications will be sorted alphabetically by their status (e.g., Active; Active: Refill in process; Active: Submitted, etc.)
   Then, within each status grouping, they will be sorted alphabetically by medication name.
   Then, within each alphabetical grouping, medications will be arranged based on their last fill date in descending order (newest to oldest).

2. Sorted by Last Fill Date (New to Old) > Alphabetical: * Medications will be listed in descending order of last fill date (newest to oldest).
   Then, within the same fill date, they will be sorted alphabetically by medication name.

3. Sorted Alphabetically by Medication Name > Last Fill Date (New to Old): * Medications will be sorted alphabetically by their names.
   Then, within the same alphabetical grouping, they will be further sorted based on their last fill date in descending order (newest to oldest).

Testing done

• Tested locally
• Updated VCR tests
• Ran VCR tests

Screenshots

None

What areas of the site does it impact?

MHV medications app

Acceptance criteria

• I fixed|updated|added unit tests and integration tests for each feature (if applicable).
• No error nor warning in the console.
• Events are being sent to the appropriate logging solution
• Documentation has been updated (link to documentation)
• No sensitive information (i.e. PII/credentials/internal URLs/etc.) is captured in logging, hardcoded, or specs
• Feature/bug has a monitor built into Datadog or Grafana (if applicable)
• If app impacted requires authentication, did you login to a local build and verify all authenticated routes work as expected
• I added a screenshot of the developed feature

Requested Feedback

(OPTIONAL)What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?