Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use boolean for clearer signal of a grouped update #9041

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jakecoffman
Copy link
Member

In #8963 I am running into a problem where using directory and directories is not a clear enough signal that this is supposed to be a grouped update, so switching to the grouped-update boolean.

@jakecoffman
Copy link
Member Author

Smoke tests should be fixed by this PR: dependabot/smoke-tests#184

@jakecoffman jakecoffman marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2024 13:54
@jakecoffman jakecoffman requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2024 13:54
Comment on lines 169 to 171
# We will need to do a pass updating the CLI and smoke tests before this is possible,
# so let's consider it optional for now. If we get a nil value, let's force it to be
# an array.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this comment applies to the @dependency_groups variable, so let's move things around so it stays close?

@jakecoffman
Copy link
Member Author

Now that we did #9040 I'm inclined to not do this and continue to let the updater code figure out if it's grouped based on the presence of a group that applies in the job definition.

The main factor for this before was that the API was sending groups with security updates, so it wasn't possible to decide if the updater was supposed to use it. Now that it is explicit with the applies-to we don't need this boolean.

@jakecoffman jakecoffman deleted the jakecoffman/use-grouped-updates-boolean branch June 10, 2024 18:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants