Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

conflicts - add space between button label and octicon #7302

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 16, 2019

Conversation

shiftkey
Copy link
Member

Overview

Closes out this bit of feedback from #7218:

  • The resolve carrot is warped. Shouldn't it look like the Open in Editor one?
Screen Shot 2019-04-04 at 7 55 42 AM Screen Shot 2019-04-04 at 8 39 53 AM

Description

I ended up just focusing on the spacing between the two elements because the "Open in Editor" flow has two buttons (the left button launching the editor, the second button displaying a context menu) and that didn't feel consistent here (because I only have a context menu to show).

Current development branch - resolving merge and rebase conflict where manual options are required:

After this PR:

Release notes

Notes: [Improved] button style for manual conflict resolution options

@shiftkey shiftkey added the tech-debt Issues and pull requests related to addressing technical debt or improving the codebase label Apr 15, 2019
@tierninho
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM 🎉

@shiftkey shiftkey added the ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers label Apr 15, 2019
@niik niik self-assigned this Apr 16, 2019
Co-Authored-By: shiftkey <brendan@github.com>
@shiftkey shiftkey requested a review from niik April 16, 2019 16:26
@niik niik merged commit f24585a into development Apr 16, 2019
@niik niik deleted the manual-conflict-button-style branch April 16, 2019 19:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers tech-debt Issues and pull requests related to addressing technical debt or improving the codebase
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants