ability to set unconscious actors to retain vision #81
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi! I've just done this as a quick proof-of-concept for to resolve #80. Adds a new setting (I didn't bother with localizing, since you might not event want this) which just makes it so that unconscious tokens are still able to "see" if they would otherwise be able to. If you remove the change in
token.mjsit'll still make the map invisible to the token, but keep modifying the_canDetectfunctions (though admittedly under normal circumstances it seems in V12 with 3.2 there's an outline of otherwise-would-be-visible tokens anyway - not sure whether it's a feature addition I missed but that would make this change irrelevant).I've also got one ready to go on top of 1.14.3 if you wanted to release one last V11-compatible version with that as an added feature. No worries if not! Just thought it'd be a fun code exercise.