Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JwtTokenAuth should be serializable #52

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2018

Conversation

msvrtan
Copy link
Contributor

@msvrtan msvrtan commented Jun 21, 2018

..

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 21, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #52 into master will increase coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #52      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     43.83%   44.06%   +0.22%     
- Complexity      300      302       +2     
============================================
  Files            63       63              
  Lines           981      985       +4     
============================================
+ Hits            430      434       +4     
  Misses          551      551
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
src/Auth/JwtTokenAuth.php 100% <100%> (ø) 10 <2> (+2) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e8e6ddf...2190872. Read the comment docs.

@msvrtan msvrtan force-pushed the jwt-token-should-be-serializable branch from 5da2506 to fefde27 Compare June 21, 2018 20:14
@msvrtan msvrtan force-pushed the jwt-token-should-be-serializable branch from fefde27 to 2190872 Compare June 21, 2018 20:17
@msvrtan msvrtan merged commit 9a8393e into master Jun 21, 2018
@msvrtan msvrtan deleted the jwt-token-should-be-serializable branch June 21, 2018 20:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants