-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add supportURL and provider in metadata, update some description #601
add supportURL and provider in metadata, update some description #601
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Stephanie <yangcao@redhat.com>
17549c8
to
087ec3d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally looks good to me. Left one comment/suggestion.
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ type GitLikeProjectSource struct { | |||
// +optional | |||
CheckoutFrom *CheckoutFrom `json:"checkoutFrom,omitempty"` | |||
|
|||
// The remotes map which should be initialized in the git project. Must have at least one remote configured | |||
// The remotes map which should be initialized in the git project. | |||
// Projects must have at least one remote configured while StarterProjects can only have at most one remote configured. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this comment be added to the StarterProject
and Project
structs as well (over ProjectSource maybe)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WDYM? should it already included? since StarterProject/Projects.ProjectSource
references GitLikeProjectSource
Signed-off-by: Stephanie <yangcao@redhat.com>
6b5d4d7
to
1536acc
Compare
Signed-off-by: Stephanie <yangcao@redhat.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: amisevsk, johnmcollier, yangcao77 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Stephanie yangcao@redhat.com
What does this PR do?:
This PR adds provider & supportURL as optional fields in devfile metadata, to allow to include provider and support information of stacks/samples
This PR also updated some description to fix #522 and #536
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
#539
Fixes #522
Fixes #536
PR acceptance criteria:
Testing and documentation do not need to be complete in order for this PR to be approved. We just need to ensure tracking issues are opened.
Unit/Functional tests
QE Integration test
Documentation
Client Impact
How to test changes / Special notes to the reviewer: