Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A developer can select a dummy user identity for request signing #482

Closed
ghost opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

A developer can select a dummy user identity for request signing #482

ghost opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 20, 2020

If a developer is working on a front-end application, it would be nice if they could quickly swap between dummy identities to test access (for example).

The original description:

The standard UserLib should contain several dummy user identities that can be selected from the front-end application for the purposes of signing user requests to the canister. These identities are likely key pairs with minimal metadata (like IDs and maybe human-readable names as an affordance) that can be switched between in the browser developer tools console (i.e. window.DFINITY.switchUsers(1);). We may consider enhancing this behavior with a browser extension in the future.

@ghost ghost added the enhancement label Mar 20, 2020
dfinity-bot added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2020
## Changelog for advisory-db:
Branch: master
Commits: [rustsec/advisory-db@af0ee095...f958b208](rustsec/advisory-db@af0ee09...f958b20)

* [`7b5e7886`](rustsec/advisory-db@7b5e788) Report soundness bug with lock_api ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#483](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/483))
* [`78ad57d1`](rustsec/advisory-db@78ad57d) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0070 to lock_api ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#484](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/484))
* [`793301b1`](rustsec/advisory-db@793301b) Potential segfault in the time crate ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#485](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/485))
* [`1d7066d6`](rustsec/advisory-db@1d7066d) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0071 to time ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#486](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/486))
* [`15125a95`](rustsec/advisory-db@15125a9) Report soundness bug with concurrency in futures-intrusive ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#482](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/482))
* [`f958b208`](rustsec/advisory-db@f958b20) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0072 to futures-intrusive ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#487](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/487))
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 19, 2020
## Changelog for advisory-db:
Branch: master
Commits: [rustsec/advisory-db@af0ee095...f958b208](rustsec/advisory-db@af0ee09...f958b20)

* [`7b5e7886`](rustsec/advisory-db@7b5e788) Report soundness bug with lock_api ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#483](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/483))
* [`78ad57d1`](rustsec/advisory-db@78ad57d) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0070 to lock_api ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#484](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/484))
* [`793301b1`](rustsec/advisory-db@793301b) Potential segfault in the time crate ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#485](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/485))
* [`1d7066d6`](rustsec/advisory-db@1d7066d) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0071 to time ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#486](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/486))
* [`15125a95`](rustsec/advisory-db@15125a9) Report soundness bug with concurrency in futures-intrusive ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#482](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/482))
* [`f958b208`](rustsec/advisory-db@f958b20) Assigned RUSTSEC-2020-0072 to futures-intrusive ([RustSec/advisory-db⁠#487](http://r.duckduckgo.com/l/?uddg=https://github.com/RustSec/advisory-db/issues/487))
@adamspofford-dfinity
Copy link
Contributor

Duplicated by existing multi-identity functionality.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant