Fix haddocks for RecordField/Binding/FieldSelection
#2098
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes #2096 `haddock` doesn't correctly handle block comments in code blocks if the haddock comment itself is a block comment. However, if the haddock comment uses line comments then it works just fine.
sjakobi
approved these changes
Nov 16, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've reported the problem with haddock in haskell/haddock#1254.
|
@sjakobi: Thank you for reporting that! 🙂 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #2096
haddockdoesn't correctly handle block comments in code blocks ifthe haddock comment itself is a block comment. However, if the haddock
comment uses line comments then it works just fine.