Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore/upgrade deps #153

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Chore/upgrade deps #153

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

mattdean-digicatapult
Copy link
Contributor

@mattdean-digicatapult mattdean-digicatapult commented Jan 4, 2024

Upgrades all dependencies to latest versions possible:

  1. Substrate to the release-polkadot-v1.5.0 branch
  2. jsonrpsee to 0.16.3 which is the latest version compatible with the released version of substrate
  3. all other deps to latest published in crates.io

Note this is a major version bump of the node because of the inclusion of paritytech/substrate#13384

Companion PRs:

  1. Chore/upgrade node sqnc-hyproof-api#63
  2. Chore/upgrade node sqnc-matchmaker-api#250
  3. Chore/upgrade node sqnc-ipfs#161

In terms of testing beyond the automation tests here I've done the following:

  • ensured the tests in dependent repos pass
  • brought up the 3 persona hyproof compose and ensured that I can initiate a ceritificate

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2024

This PR updates the following pallets - they may also require updates to their extrinsic weights:
process-validation symmetric-key

For the author and any reviewers:

  • consider whether the changes could significantly affect the weight of any extrinsics
  • consider whether benchmarks need updating to correctly cover weight variations over inputs

For a guide on running benchmarks to update weights see calculating weights

@mattdean-digicatapult
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR updates the following pallets - they may also require updates to their extrinsic weights: process-validation symmetric-key

For the author and any reviewers:

* consider whether the changes could significantly affect the weight of any extrinsics

* consider whether benchmarks need updating to correctly cover weight variations over inputs

For a guide on running benchmarks to update weights see calculating weights

No need to update weights as there is no logical change here that should massively change them

@mattdean-digicatapult mattdean-digicatapult merged commit a61e6d3 into main Jan 5, 2024
8 checks passed
@mattdean-digicatapult mattdean-digicatapult deleted the chore/upgrade-deps branch January 5, 2024 08:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants