Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubernetes: add support for optional cascading deletes #938

Conversation

varshavaradarajan
Copy link
Contributor

This PR vendors godo v1.57.0 and adds subcommands and flags to support optional cascading deletes for a Kubernetes cluster.

cc @adamwg , @MorrisLaw

@varshavaradarajan varshavaradarajan force-pushed the varsha/support-optional-cascading-deletes branch from c488d77 to 0492aea Compare January 19, 2021 02:51
Copy link
Member

@andrewsomething andrewsomething left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! A few nit picks inline, mostly around copy. We'd love to get an integration test as well.

https://github.com/digitalocean/doctl/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#integration-tests

commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@varshavaradarajan varshavaradarajan force-pushed the varsha/support-optional-cascading-deletes branch 2 times, most recently from 0ff3cb6 to 11fd991 Compare January 19, 2021 22:49
Base automatically changed from master to main January 20, 2021 19:04
@varshavaradarajan
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @sharmita3

commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@sharmita3 sharmita3 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a couple of inline copy suggestions for the reference doc updates.

Copy link
Contributor

@MorrisLaw MorrisLaw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a nit. Otherwise looks good after you address @sharmita3's comments.

commands/displayers/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@varshavaradarajan varshavaradarajan force-pushed the varsha/support-optional-cascading-deletes branch 2 times, most recently from d521876 to 4a093f1 Compare January 28, 2021 22:07
@varshavaradarajan varshavaradarajan force-pushed the varsha/support-optional-cascading-deletes branch from 4a093f1 to 71907d6 Compare January 28, 2021 22:10
@varshavaradarajan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andrewsomething - can you please 👍 and merge this?

commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
commands/kubernetes.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@varshavaradarajan varshavaradarajan force-pushed the varsha/support-optional-cascading-deletes branch 3 times, most recently from 3a89d68 to 5bd80e7 Compare January 29, 2021 20:41
Copy link
Member

@andrewsomething andrewsomething left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks great!

@andrewsomething andrewsomething merged commit 53dbe67 into digitalocean:main Jan 29, 2021
@varshavaradarajan varshavaradarajan deleted the varsha/support-optional-cascading-deletes branch January 29, 2021 21:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants