Sorting in backend removes relationship dependencies

[firstIssue]

When using the standard 'sort' field in a relational field, it just removes another relation when being drag/dropped.

I have a station with relation to scenes, those scenes again have relations to contents.
If I drag the scenes in their order and save, directus removes the relation to the content and generates a new empty one.

---

Project details

Directus Version: 9.0.0-rc.34
Environment: production
OS: Linux 4.15.0-88-generic
Node: 10.23.2

[rijkvanzanten]

@firstIssue Would you be able to share a DB dump where this is happening? Saves me a bunch of time trying to reproduce your exact setup based on this:

I have a station with relation to scenes, those scenes again have relations to contents.

🙂

[firstIssue]

@firstIssue Would you be able to share a DB dump where this is happening? Saves me a bunch of time trying to reproduce your exact setup based on this:

I have a station with relation to scenes, those scenes again have relations to contents.

🙂

What format do you need

@firstIssue Would you be able to share a DB dump where this is happening? Saves me a bunch of time trying to reproduce your exact setup based on this:

I have a station with relation to scenes, those scenes again have relations to contents.

🙂

I hope this is the right format for you, not that familar with DB exporting and handling.
dump (1).zip

[rijkvanzanten]

A SQL dump like you provided is perfect! That being said.. You shared an empty file 😁

[rijkvanzanten]

I'll close this for now as I can't reproduce it, and the provided DB dump is totally empty..

@firstIssue Is this still happening for you? If so, can you share a db dump?

[firstIssue]

Did you check the dump I sent you via mail? As this one here was the wrong one, the one per mail is 1,2MB. @rijkvanzanten

[rijkvanzanten]

Ah, I didn't realize that was you haha. Thanks! @firstIssue

[benhaynes]

@rijkvanzanten — Is this the same issue as: #3875

[rijkvanzanten]

Could be, hard to tell from the known info on both

[rijkvanzanten]

I believe this is fixed in #5484