chore: use satisfies where applicable
#8884
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
github-actions
bot
added
packages:brokers
packages:builders
packages:rest
packages:ws
labels
github-actions
bot
requested review from
iCrawl,
kyranet,
SpaceEEC and
vladfrangu
suneettipirneni
force-pushed
the
chore/use-satisfies
branch
from
89aad29
to
08eb92b
Compare
kyranet
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2022
vladfrangu
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2022
It appears this issue is resolved. Can you still see if they are needed? |
suneettipirneni
force-pushed
the
chore/use-satisfies
branch
from
08eb92b
to
ae4b5d4
Compare
Thanks for pointing this out, those are now removed. |
iCrawl
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:
We need a couple eslint-ignores because of typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#6077
Status and versioning classification: