Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pass base context URI when processing links #3324

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2019
Merged

Pass base context URI when processing links #3324

merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2019

Conversation

raducoravu
Copy link
Member

Proposed fix for:
#3078

@@ -696,7 +700,10 @@ mode="topicpull:figure-linktext" and mode="topicpull:table-linktext"
<xsl:if test="exists($shortdesc) and not(normalize-space($shortdesc) = '')">
<xsl:apply-templates select="." mode="topicpull:add-genshortdesc-PI"/>
<desc class="- topic/desc ">
<xsl:apply-templates select="$shortdesc"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="$shortdesc">
<!-- EXM-42721 Pass the base context element. -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be removed

@jelovirt
Copy link
Member

DCO is missing.

@jelovirt jelovirt added this to In progress in 3.4 via automation Jun 13, 2019
@jelovirt jelovirt added bug preprocess priority/medium Medium (or unknown) priority issue labels Jun 13, 2019
@jelovirt
Copy link
Member

Could you squash the commits and use descriptive commit message, the current "Update topicpullImpl.xsl" is a bit generic.

Signed-off-by: Radu Coravu <radu_coravu@sync.ro>

Update topicpullImpl.xsl

Signed-off-by: Radu Coravu <radu_coravu@sync.ro>
3.4 automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved Jun 22, 2019
@jelovirt jelovirt merged commit 1aa1392 into dita-ot:develop Jun 22, 2019
3.4 automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done Jun 22, 2019
@jelovirt jelovirt added this to the 3.4 milestone Jun 22, 2019
@infotexture
Copy link
Member

@raducoravu Does this resolve #3078, or are there aspects of that issue unaddressed by these changes?

@raducoravu
Copy link
Member Author

@infotexture there are still cases in which the warning is shown, I gave more details and a sample in #3078. But the warning seems to be benign in that case so maybe we should leave this as such.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug preprocess priority/medium Medium (or unknown) priority issue
Projects
No open projects
3.4
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants