WIP: Use sparse_list to save memory (see #1117) #1451
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The sparse list implementation avoids allocating the result cache elements
until something triggers loading the actual content.
This has a slight memory increase for very small querysets – roughly a custom
class + dict() vs. a list() – but the actual result data will usually be much
larger and the difference is cancelled out by the time the result cache is at a
thousand items.
This branch is currently broken using the released version of sparse_list – see
johnsyweb/python_sparse_list#5