-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 594
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[enh] fix issue 10965 - Allow alias initializer as enum member to avoid counter reset #2529
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
enum E1 | ||
{ | ||
alias a, | ||
b, | ||
c = 2, | ||
alias d = c, | ||
e, | ||
} | ||
|
||
static assert(E1.a == 0); | ||
static assert(E1.b == 0); | ||
static assert(E1.c == 2); | ||
static assert(E1.d == 2); | ||
static assert(E1.e == 3); | ||
|
||
enum E2 | ||
{ | ||
a, | ||
b, | ||
alias c = a, | ||
d, | ||
alias e = a, | ||
f, | ||
} | ||
|
||
static assert(E2.a == 0); | ||
static assert(E2.b == 1); | ||
static assert(E2.c == 0); | ||
static assert(E2.d == 2); | ||
static assert(E2.e == 0); | ||
static assert(E2.f == 3); | ||
|
||
void main() { } |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's a little more than what the enhancement request is about, it's also a very special case compared to what alias usually does, I think we shouldn't go this far.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was thinking about this, too. So initializers are needed for alias members?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They're supposed to refer to existing members, e.g.
alias b = a;
.Anyway, it's kind of fast to implement this already, since I've just filed the enhancement. Maybe a NG discussion should be made first to get a go-ahead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well I've posted to the newsgroups. I don't have high hopes that it will be accepted. However Issue 9395 is something that can easily pass through. If you want to have a go at it, you might want to see Pull 463 for a reference.