Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Read json format of gbtree and gblinear #81

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tonylee19544
Copy link

This will add support for json format and binary format of gbtree and gblinear which have the version not younger than v1.0.0

@dmitryikh
Copy link
Owner

@tonylee19544 , great job! That's definitely what leaves needs!

I will come back yo you with review after the easter holidays.

@tonylee19544
Copy link
Author

Hi would like to ask if there is some news for the pull request. Thanks.

@bgweber
Copy link

bgweber commented Sep 1, 2021

@dmitryikh Can you review? Super useful library and the json bindings help modernize!

@ruthlee
Copy link

ruthlee commented Mar 31, 2022

Yes!! Would love to see this merged @dmitryikh

@adensur
Copy link

adensur commented May 20, 2022

Have a problem with this pull request.
I have an xgboost model trained with version 1.6.0. Training code: https://gist.github.com/adensur/134b82c304cc69eed278e258e6b2a685
json read error: json: cannot unmarshal number into Go struct field Tree.learner.gradient_booster.model.trees.default_left of type bool
"default_left" field in tree nodes are ints (in current xgboost version, at least), not bools.
After fixing that, the prediction result is incorrect. I don't understand where this formula is coming from: https://github.com/dmitryikh/leaves/pull/81/files#diff-c524a0589fd250b78ba6e81dbd14998971af6ea9fd8dd2aad8c2dd8e3ecf6a4dR334
But without it prediction is correct, in my case at least

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants