Add information about sozo arguments priorities #176 #269
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Hello @glihm 👋 could you check If this is going on good path? thanks! Discord: roloxworld |
|
hello @RolandoDrRobot, thank you for the contribution. I will review this ASAP. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the PR here @RolandoDrRobot! We may also show some examples on how to use a keystore file instead of private key for instance. To ensure users know about those alternatives.
| - `account(provider, env_metadata)`: Creates a StarkNet account using the specified options. Takes into account the configuration priorities to determine the account address and other settings. | ||
| - `account_address(env_metadata)`: Returns the StarkNet account address. Takes into account the configuration priorities. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Aren't those inside the sozo code? Not sure if a sozo user should know about this technical specificity. Or what was the idea behind this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I was just documenting everything I saw in the code file https://github.com/lambda-0x/dojo/blob/9bf0a0894eadb7052fab586886ee02ba6beae351/crates/sozo/src/commands/options/account.rs but you are right, people may not need this, removing It
| @@ -35,3 +35,9 @@ The configuration system follows the following priority order: | |||
| ```bash | |||
| sozo --rpc-url http://localhost:7474/ | |||
| ``` | |||
|
|
|||
| ### Use a keystore file for account configuration | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this correct? what u were meaning? otherwise could you provide me an example or where to get It? thanks @glihm @lambda-0x
|
@lambda-0x @glihm Hello guys 👋 is this still active? let me know If wanna add something else to PR |
Sorry for the delay man the notification went of my radar, appreciate your ping here. @lambda-0x has some feedback he will made and then ready to merge. |
|
@glihm thank you 🙏 |
lambda-0x
force-pushed
the
ra-book-176-Add-information-about-sozo-arguments-priorities
branch
from
eee32c4
to
4c1748a
Compare
lambda-0x
force-pushed
the
ra-book-176-Add-information-about-sozo-arguments-priorities
branch
from
5f92f87
to
339b1d5
Compare
|
@RolandoDrRobot sorry for the delay on this, and thank you for your contribution! |
This the issue #176
Sozo is being reworked to have these priorities:
We may add a section on that on the book once this PR is merged dojoengine/dojo#1405 to bring better understanding for the user to the possibilities around configurations.