New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support CentOS 8 #4010
Comments
Following along to see if CentOS 8 is on the roadmap. |
Doh, I'm dumb. That made me look at the source and I saw: It's on master, but not on the latest tag. So I'm guessing the next version will support 20.04? |
I've already released 0.20.4 for Ubuntu 20.04. If you are installing via the bootstrap.sh script, note that the master branch is up to date, but you might be using a pinned version that explicitly restricts newer releases. The next pinned version will support 20.04. For CentOS 8 support, I neither have a CentOS 8 server nor do I care to set one up. I build fairly generic packages, so it should work fine on Centos 8, but I haven't tested it. If someone would like to test it and either verify it works or PR anything that is broken, great, otherwise I'm unlikely to do anything (and may just drop support entirely because it's not like I explicitly test it). For anyone who wants a roadmap or update on this or any issue, feel free to sponsor the project and I'll be happy to give you a roadmap. |
Sorry if I seemed like I was demanding a roadmap; I just wanted to know what's "on the maintainers' minds". Actually I wouldn't mind testing CentOS 8, but if there's not a lot of interest in that, I'll move to Ubuntu 20.04, no problem (that's why I was asking. It's perfectly fine to reduce scope if this is unpaid work- and it's even better to be open about it!). Thanks and apologies for not explaining myself well. Álex |
I just don't have a CentOS server and am not familiar with it (not that there are a ton of differences but it is different from Debian). If you can download the CentOS 7 packages on a CentOS 8 server and verify they work the same, I'll just add them to the CentOS 8 setup and we'll be good. If they aren't compatible, then I'll take the PRs to make them compatible and include the changes in releases going forward. From my point of view, we should support LTS releases of whatever OSs we support. CentOS 8 would probably be supported already except all our CI runs on Ubuntu and CircleCI doesn't support CentOS. If someone wants to sponsor tested support on a specific configuration, I'm happy to take that money and setup all the fancy CI systems to validate everything the same way we currently we do with Ubuntu. |
I am afraid I'm not familiar enough with the project to commit to supporting CentOS 8, and I'm fine with running Ubuntu 20.04, I was just curious about the matter. In fact, my suggestion would be to focus effort on something else than supporting a wide array of distros (personally I'd just support one specific Ubuntu LTS)- proper way to run Dokku IMHO is to dedicate a host to it, so it's likely that spending resources on something else might be more effective (if CentOS was supported I'd prefer to run that because it fits better with my current infra, but that's something specific to me and Ubuntu is perfectly fine). I appreciate the work you do on Dokku- it's a wonderful project and it's saved me a ton of effort deploying some personal projects on my infra. I can contribute a bit to CentOS 8 support if you want, but it wouldn't be honest to commit to significant support. If you want I can test a release and report back, but unless something is broken which can be easily fixed, it's likely I won't be able to fix it. I've done some RPM/DEB packaging work, but it's not my area of expertise, so I don't think it's wise for me to take on such work on a project as significant as Dokku. |
The lowest level contribution you can do is try to install that centos7 repository on a centos8 server and report back on anything thats broken. If nothing is broken, I can add centos 8. If something is broken, someone can investigate that and fix it. |
TL;DR, doesn't work:
If no one volunteers, I'd document that CentOS 8 is not supported, ask for volunteers and move on. I can help you with further testing, but I can't commit to a lot of help (nor expertise). Long version:
|
Is there an open issue upstream for the docker installation issue? Does Centos 8 come with its own Docker repo? |
Oh: docker/docker-install#154 . Following some links to docker/docker-ce-packaging#444 :
...
No. CentOS and RHEL come with https://podman.io/ and the ... IMHO, I would close this ticket. It might be possible to run Dokku using Personally, I'm happy to move to 20.04. |
Okay so I think the way forward here is to add the full path to the python bin as a dependency. That will fix our support for CentOS 8 and we'll be working completely when Docker makes their next release. |
This will fix compatibility with CentOS 8 by requiring a binary path that can be fulfilled by the python3 package. Closes #4010
Closing as there is a pull request open to add the python3 bin path as a dependency. Built rpms can be tested from the build artifacts if desired, but this should work as a solution for the issue. |
I'm running Dokku on Ubuntu 16.04, which is going out of support soon, so I want to migrate to a newer distro.
Dokku is available for Ubuntu 18.04 and CentOS 7, which will be supported longer, but it doesn't seem ideal to migrate to those when Ubuntu 20.04 and/or CentOS 8 are already available.
If there are no short-term plans to support newer distros, that's fine and I would migrate to Ubuntu 18.04. However, if it's on the roadmap to support Ubuntu 20.04 or CentOS 8 before Ubuntu 16.04 goes out of support (next year, if I'm not mistaken), I'd rather migrate directly to those.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: