Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JitArm64: Call rlwinmx implementation from rlwnmx with imm b #12431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 17, 2023

Conversation

JosJuice
Copy link
Member

This way we get some additional optimized cases for rlwnmx with imm b.

This way we get some additional optimized cases for rlwnmx with imm b.
@dolphin-ci
Copy link

dolphin-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2023

FifoCI detected that this change impacts graphical rendering. Here are the behavior differences detected by the system:

  • last-story-shadows on mvk-osx-m1: diff
  • nhl-slap on mvk-osx-m1: diff
  • DKCR-Char on mtl-osx-m1: diff
  • et-vid on mtl-osx-m1: diff
  • jj-awae-mirrored on mtl-osx-m1: diff
  • pbr-sfx on mtl-osx-m1: diff
  • rs3-bumpmapping on mtl-osx-m1: diff
  • smg-mmg on mtl-osx-m1: diff
  • thps3-earlyz on mtl-osx-m1: diff

automated-fifoci-reporter

@@ -182,6 +182,8 @@ class JitArm64 : public JitBase, public Arm64Gen::ARM64CodeBlock, public CommonA

bool IsFPRStoreSafe(size_t guest_reg) const;

void rlwinmx_internal(UGeckoInstruction inst, u32 sh);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this intended to be public?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, I guess it has no real reason to be public... All these other helper methods already were, though. What do you think, should I move this one to private?

Copy link
Member

@lioncash lioncash Dec 17, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tbh, the other respective helpers should also reasonably be private if they have no need to be public. I'm fine merging as is, if you'd prefer to do that as it's own thing. It's not really a hard blocker or anything.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think I'll do that in a separate PR then.

@lioncash lioncash merged commit 51a44aa into dolphin-emu:master Dec 17, 2023
11 checks passed
@JosJuice JosJuice deleted the jitarm64-rlwnmx-call-rlwinmx branch December 17, 2023 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants