Improve compile process #116
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ def initialize_frontend_dependencies(): | |||
| # Create the nextpy directory. | |||
| path_ops.mkdir(constants.Nextpy.DIR) | |||
| # validate dependencies before install | |||
| validate_frontend_dependencies() | |||
| # validate_frontend_dependencies() | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function call to validate_frontend_dependencies() has been commented out. This could potentially lead to unvalidated frontend dependencies being used in the build process, which may introduce compatibility issues or security vulnerabilities. It's important to understand the rationale behind this change and ensure that any necessary validation is still being performed elsewhere in the build process.
- # validate_frontend_dependencies()
+ validate_frontend_dependencies()Please provide context for this change or consider reinstating the validation if it's crucial for the build integrity.
Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| # validate_frontend_dependencies() | |
| validate_frontend_dependencies() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
poetry.lockis excluded by:!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (7)
- nextpy/app.py (5 hunks)
- nextpy/backend/state.py (1 hunks)
- nextpy/build/compiler/compiler.py (1 hunks)
- nextpy/build/prerequisites.py (2 hunks)
- nextpy/build/testing.py (1 hunks)
- nextpy/constants/base.py (1 hunks)
- nextpy/frontend/templates/apps/base/code/base.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- nextpy/constants/base.py
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- nextpy/build/prerequisites.py
Additional comments: 19
nextpy/frontend/templates/apps/base/code/base.py (2)
- 13-14: The addition of the
Stateclass as a subclass ofxt.Stateis a good placeholder for future state management within the app.- 17-17: The removal of the docstring "Create the app and compile it." should be verified. If this docstring was providing necessary context or documentation, consider adding it back or updating it to reflect any new changes.
nextpy/build/compiler/compiler.py (1)
- 443-468: The addition of the
ExecutorSafeFunctionsclass with its attributes and methods is well-documented and seems to be correctly implemented for parallel processing tasks.nextpy/app.py (15)
- 12-14: The addition of
multiprocessingandplatformimports aligns with the changes to thecompile_method that utilizes these modules for parallel processing.- 640-649: The setup of the progress tracking using the
rich.progressmodule is correctly implemented, with an appropriate total task count.- 727-733: The conditional logic to use a forking process pool on Linux and Darwin systems is appropriate and should improve performance due to the faster process spawning on these platforms.
- 738-743: The
_mark_completecallback function and the_submit_workhelper function are well-implemented for managing the completion of tasks and submitting new tasks to the executor.- 747-749: The submission of tasks for compiling page components is correctly handled using the
ExecutorSafeFunctions.compile_pagemethod.- 752-753: The task submission for compiling the app wrapper using
ExecutorSafeFunctions.compile_appis correctly implemented.- 756-756: The submission of tasks for compiling custom components is correctly handled.
- 759-759: The task submission for compiling the root stylesheet is correctly implemented.
- 762-762: The task submission for compiling the root document is correctly implemented.
- 765-765: The task submission for compiling the theme is correctly implemented.
- 768-768: The task submission for compiling contexts is correctly implemented.
- 775-777: The conditional logic for compiling the Tailwind configuration if it is present in the config is correctly implemented.
- 783-788: The logic to update imports from
AppWrapcomponents and iterate through all custom components to add their imports is correctly implemented.- 792-796: The steps to purge the
.web pagesdirectory and stop the progress tracking are correctly implemented.- 798-802: The logic to install frontend packages based on the compiled results and write the compiled code to the output path is correctly implemented.
nextpy/backend/state.py (1)
- 2145-2155: The addition of the
code_uses_state_contextsfunction is a straightforward check for the presence of a specific pattern in the JavaScript code to determine the use of state contexts. This seems like a valid approach for the intended purpose.
| @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ def _initialize_app(self): | |||
| nextpy.build.config.get_config(reload=True) | |||
| # reset xt.State subclasses | |||
| State.class_subclasses.clear() | |||
| os.environ.pop(nextpy.constants.PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST, None) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removing an environment variable without a default value can raise a KeyError if the variable is not set. Consider providing a default value.
- os.environ.pop(nextpy.constants.PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST, None)
+ os.environ.pop(nextpy.constants.PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST, None)Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| os.environ.pop(nextpy.constants.PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST, None) | |
| os.environ.pop(nextpy.constants.PYTEST_CURRENT_TEST, None) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- nextpy/build/prerequisites.py (3 hunks)
- nextpy/build/processes.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- nextpy/build/prerequisites.py
Additional comments: 1
nextpy/build/processes.py (1)
- 227-228: The addition of a check for
process.stdout.closedbefore attempting to read from it is a good practice to avoid potential errors when the stream is closed unexpectedly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (2)
- nextpy/app.py (7 hunks)
- nextpy/build/prerequisites.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- nextpy/app.py
- nextpy/build/prerequisites.py
compile_method.code_uses_state_contextsto check if the rendered JavaScript uses state contexts.ExecutorSafeFunctionswith multiple class attributes and methods for parallel processing during compilation tasks.os.environ.pop().base.pyto alter the output message.ExecutorSafeFunctionsclass and used a forking process pool for multiprocessing on Linux and Darwin systems.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
concurrent.futureswith a customExecutorSafeFunctionsclass for improved parallel processing.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style