Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean up #8536

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023
Merged

Clean up #8536

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023

Conversation

RussKie
Copy link
Member

@RussKie RussKie commented Mar 20, 2023

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 77.77% and project coverage change: -0.01 ⚠️

Comparison is base (a3aeda1) 76.29% compared to head (50d8f94) 76.29%.

❗ Current head 50d8f94 differs from pull request most recent head b7f52f5. Consider uploading reports for the commit b7f52f5 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8536      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.29%   76.29%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         858      858              
  Lines       30639    30638       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        23377    23375       -2     
- Misses       7262     7263       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...icrosoft.DocAsCode.Build.Engine/DocumentBuilder.cs 75.12% <ø> (-0.13%) ⬇️
...rosoft.DocAsCode.Dotnet/SymbolFormatter.Symbols.cs 21.50% <0.00%> (ø)
....DocAsCode.Dotnet/Visitors/SymbolVisitorAdapter.cs 94.55% <100.00%> (ø)
...ft.DocAsCode.Dotnet/Visitors/YamlModelGenerator.cs 97.87% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@yufeih yufeih left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @RussKie !

samples/Directory.Build.props Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@yufeih yufeih added the engineering Makes the pull request to appear in the "Engineering" section of the next release note label Mar 20, 2023
* Suppress obsolete warnings CS0612 and CS0618

* Suppress NU1701, see https://learn.microsoft.com/nuget/reference/errors-and-warnings/nu1701

* Remove unused variables

* Resolves RS1024: Use 'SymbolEqualityComparer' when comparing symbols
@yufeih yufeih enabled auto-merge (squash) March 20, 2023 11:06
@yufeih yufeih disabled auto-merge March 20, 2023 11:07
@yufeih yufeih enabled auto-merge (squash) March 20, 2023 11:07
@yufeih yufeih merged commit 7e12c2c into dotnet:main Mar 20, 2023
@RussKie RussKie deleted the cleanup branch March 20, 2023 21:27
<PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.VisualBasic" Version="4.5.0" />
<PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.Common" Version="4.5.0" />
<PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Workspaces.MSBuild" Version="4.5.0" />
<PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.SourceLink.GitHub" Version="1.1.1" />
Copy link
Contributor

@WeihanLi WeihanLi Mar 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@yufeih yufeih Mar 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aha, I don't have a strong opinion, with a slight preference of NOT using central package version management because I can just copy and paste from NuGet.org and let @dependabot take care of the rest😁

Copy link
Member Author

@RussKie RussKie Mar 21, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I actually never seen that property. Though, according to the docs it's appropriate for references that apply to all projects. Not sure, if any of these truly do.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good from my side, I'm using this in my project and the NuGet package has source link info also https://www.nuget.info/packages/dotnet-execute/0.13.0.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
engineering Makes the pull request to appear in the "Engineering" section of the next release note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants