docs: profiling local CoreFX build using VTune #849
Conversation
| @@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ | |||
| - [Analyzing the Results](#Analyzing-the-Results) | |||
| - [Viewing Source Code](#Viewing-Source-Code) | |||
| - [Identifying Regressions](#Identifying-Regressions) | |||
| - [VTune](#VTune) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should have a separate section or at least briefly call out AMD uProf which is the similar program for AMD machines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
good point, we should definitely have AMD uProf section
@tannergooding do I remember correctly from your presentation that I can run AMD uProf on Intel machine? So I should be able to create similar docs myself without need to access AMD machine?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, they should work for the most part (VTune on AMD and uProf on Intel); but various options won't be supported and you may not get as accurate traces/etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If it isn't working well enough, I can cover the same example for AMD uProf and modify the doc after this PR is merged (just create an issue an assign it to me)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tannergooding excellent! Since I am now working on the PerfCollect and dotnet trace doc I am going to create a separate issue and assign you. Thanks!
This is a short summary of the recent @tannergooding talk.
https://github.com/adamsitnik/performance/blob/081b701626182d249db0964a038f9d7af217e9e1/docs/profiling-workflow-corefx.md#VTune
@tannergooding could you please take a look?