4.x: Fix PriorityQueue to not share a item ordering helper index #507
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
PriorityQueue._countfield was a static field shared between all instances thePriorityQueueof the same type argument. I can only assume this was thought as a tradeoff between having 8 more bytes per priority queue or trashing everybody else's cache who happen to be prioritizing on the same type argument.This PR simply changes it to a per instance counter and also removes the
Interlocked.Incrementas the class itself is by no means thread-safe so it makes no sense to have the creation of a fresh index atomic inEnqueue.