Ensure that CreateChecked, CreateSaturating, and CreateTruncating are publicly exposed #71493
Conversation
… publicly exposed
|
Note regarding the This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, to please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change. |
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-numerics Issue DetailsThese were meant to be publicly accessible, but interface DIMs aren't available by default on the implementing type, they have to be redeclared to be part of the public API surface.
|
| @@ -528,6 +528,63 @@ bool IBinaryInteger<byte>.TryWriteLittleEndian(Span<byte> destination, out int b | |||
| /// <inheritdoc cref="INumberBase{TSelf}.Abs(TSelf)" /> | |||
| static byte INumberBase<byte>.Abs(byte value) => value; | |||
|
|
|||
| /// <inheritdoc cref="INumberBase{TSelf}.CreateChecked{TOther}(TOther)" /> | |||
| [MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.AggressiveInlining)] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We don't have a language mechanism for explicitly invoking the base implementation? That seems like a hole (we probably discussed) that we should address. It's one thing to have a bit of boilerplate that forces us to redeclare the method as a one-liner that just delegates, but having to redo the whole implementation is unfortunate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Right, this is a general (and unfortunate) "issue" with DIMs. Ideally the language team comes up with a way to give access to this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
cc: @MadsTorgersen and @jaredpar just to see the impact
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
These were meant to be publicly accessible, but interface DIMs aren't available by default on the implementing type, they have to be redeclared to be part of the public API surface.