Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

just a test #84111

Closed
wants to merge 136 commits into from
Closed

just a test #84111

wants to merge 136 commits into from

Conversation

vargaz
Copy link
Contributor

@vargaz vargaz commented Mar 30, 2023 •
edited by kunalspathak
Loading

Based on #80297

@kunalspathak
Add VectorTableLookup 2/3/4 in hwinstrinsiclistarm64.h
c92fbdf
@kunalspathak
Add VectorTableLookup
bee0f8c
@kunalspathak
fixes to libraries
426f68a
@kunalspathak
Prototype of simple tbl
83eb54c
@kunalspathak
Some progress
d06c4a2
@kunalspathak
Some more updates
99adc17
@kunalspathak
working model
7b10969
@kunalspathak
Vector64<byte> support
87f66f7
@kunalspathak
Add VectorTableLookup_3
98e7bd2
@kunalspathak
Add VectorTableLookup_4
786e350
@kunalspathak
cleanup
e0a82b3
@kunalspathak
Remove regCount from LclVarDsc
47848b0
@kunalspathak
Some more cleanup
25a738d 
Some more cleanup
@kunalspathak
setNextConsecutiveRegisterAssignment
e492829
@kunalspathak
Some more cleanup
385abf1
@kunalspathak
TARGET_ARM64
2f4a4e3
@kunalspathak
Use getNextConsecutiveRefPositions instead of nextConsecutiveRefPosit…
8d3744b 
…ion field
@kunalspathak
jit format
8d66d45
@kunalspathak
Move getNextConsecutiveRefPosition
85d90f5
@kunalspathak
SA1141: Use tuple syntax
0a0faed
@kunalspathak
Remove the unwanted field list code
036a273
@kunalspathak
revert the flag that was mistakenly changed
791563a
@kunalspathak
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into tbl_tbx
db6036b
@kunalspathak
Add test cases
fdc94ed
@kunalspathak
FIELD_LIST
cf84fda
@kunalspathak
Use FIELD_LIST approach
06a78d4
@kunalspathak
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into tbl_tbx
2afe249
@kunalspathak
jit format and fix arm build
a086ab7
@kunalspathak
fix assert failure
450a08d
@kunalspathak
Add summary docs
5bb9302 
Add summary docs in all the required files.
@dotnet-issue-labeler
Copy link

Note regarding the new-api-needs-documentation label:

This serves as a reminder for when your PR is modifying a ref *.cs file and adding/modifying public APIs, please make sure the API implementation in the src *.cs file is documented with triple slash comments, so the PR reviewers can sign off that change.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 30, 2023

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch, @kunalspathak
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

null

Author: vargaz
Assignees: vargaz
Labels:

area-CodeGen-coreclr, new-api-needs-documentation
Milestone: -

@vargaz vargaz added NO-REVIEW Experimental/testing PR, do NOT review it and removed area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI new-api-needs-documentation labels Mar 30, 2023
@build-analysis build-analysis bot mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2023
Closed
@vargaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

vargaz commented Mar 30, 2023

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Pull request contains merge conflicts.

@vargaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

vargaz commented Mar 30, 2023

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@build-analysis build-analysis bot mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2023
Open
2 tasks
@vargaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

vargaz commented Mar 31, 2023

/azp run runtime

@azure-pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@vargaz vargaz closed this Mar 31, 2023
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 30, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@fanyang-mono fanyang-mono Awaiting requested review from fanyang-mono fanyang-mono will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review fanyang-mono is a code owner

@steveisok steveisok Awaiting requested review from steveisok steveisok will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review steveisok is a code owner

@lambdageek lambdageek Awaiting requested review from lambdageek lambdageek will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review lambdageek is a code owner

Assignees

@vargaz vargaz

Labels
NO-REVIEW Experimental/testing PR, do NOT review it
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@vargaz @kunalspathak @tannergooding @lambdageek