Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inlining now takes a list of subroutines to inline, and uses summarie… #64

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 29, 2019

Conversation

codyroux
Copy link
Contributor

…s for the others

@codyroux codyroux requested a review from fortunac August 28, 2019 20:51
@@ -465,12 +469,13 @@ let mk_inline_env
?num_loop_unroll:(num_loop_unroll = !num_unroll)
?exp_conds:(exp_conds = [])
?arch:(arch = `x86_64)
~subs:(subs : Sub.t Seq.t)
~subs:(subs : Sub.t seq)
~to_inline:(to_inline : Sub.t seq)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not super important, but what's the difference between Seq.t and seq?

@@ -1261,8 +1308,10 @@ let suite = [
" >:: test_call_7;
"Test call with disabling function inlining SAT: \n\
" >:: test_call_8;
"Test call with nested function inlining SAT: \n\
"Test call with nested function inlining UNSAT: \n\

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch!

@fortunac
Copy link

Looks good to me!

@codyroux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed! Feel free to merge if you want.

@codyroux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah dang.

@codyroux
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok fixed.

@fortunac fortunac merged commit a93d2f0 into master Aug 29, 2019
@fortunac fortunac deleted the codyroux/inline-list branch August 29, 2019 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants