Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Minor docs fix: Fix broken joblib link #251

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Minor docs fix: Fix broken joblib link #251

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/docs/index.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ from src.data import make_dataset

Often in an analysis you have long-running steps that preprocess data or train models. If these steps have been run already (and you have stored the output somewhere like the `data/interim` directory), you don't want to wait to rerun them every time. We prefer [`make`](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/) for managing steps that depend on each other, especially the long-running ones. Make is a common tool on Unix-based platforms (and [is available for Windows]()). Following the [`make` documentation](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/), [Makefile conventions](https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Makefile-Conventions.html#Makefile-Conventions), and [portability guide](http://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Portable-Make.html#Portable-Make) will help ensure your Makefiles work effectively across systems. Here are [some](http://zmjones.com/make/) [examples](http://blog.kaggle.com/2012/10/15/make-for-data-scientists/) to [get started](https://web.archive.org/web/20150206054212/http://www.bioinformaticszen.com/post/decomplected-workflows-makefiles/). A number of data folks use `make` as their tool of choice, including [Mike Bostock](https://bost.ocks.org/mike/make/).

There are other tools for managing DAGs that are written in Python instead of a DSL (e.g., [Paver](http://paver.github.io/paver/#), [Luigi](http://luigi.readthedocs.org/en/stable/index.html), [Airflow](https://airflow.apache.org/index.html), [Snakemake](https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/en/stable/), [Ruffus](http://www.ruffus.org.uk/), or [Joblib](https://pythonhosted.org/joblib/memory.html)). Feel free to use these if they are more appropriate for your analysis.
There are other tools for managing DAGs that are written in Python instead of a DSL (e.g., [Paver](http://paver.github.io/paver/#), [Luigi](http://luigi.readthedocs.org/en/stable/index.html), [Airflow](https://airflow.apache.org/index.html), [Snakemake](https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/en/stable/), [Ruffus](http://www.ruffus.org.uk/), or [Joblib](https://joblib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/memory.html)). Feel free to use these if they are more appropriate for your analysis.

### Build from the environment up

Expand Down