Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👷 Attempt to switch to pnp linker #4368

Merged
merged 26 commits into from Oct 25, 2023
Merged

👷 Attempt to switch to pnp linker #4368

merged 26 commits into from Oct 25, 2023

Conversation

dubzzz
Copy link
Owner

@dubzzz dubzzz commented Oct 22, 2023

Target being a faster CI!

Category:

  • ✨ Introduce new features
  • 📝 Add or update documentation
  • ✅ Add or update tests
  • 🐛 Fix a bug
  • 🏷️ Add or update types
  • ⚡️ Improve performance
  • Other(s): ...

Potential impacts:

  • Generated values
  • Shrink values
  • Performance
  • Typings
  • Other(s): ...

@codesandbox-ci
Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Oct 22, 2023

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit ce97804:

Sandbox Source
Vanilla Configuration
@fast-check/examples Configuration

dubzzz added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Up-to-now we have been importing buffer while it's a known native package in node.

So in order to avoid node from pulling its own, we were relying on path import. We switched to a way safer approach: we alias the buffer package with another name and we import it via its other name. It avoid path related hazards and let the package manager and node responsible to tell the code where to find the relevant package.

Satellite PR for #4368
@dubzzz dubzzz mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2023
12 tasks
dubzzz added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Up-to-now when changing the test runner used internally by Jest, we were passing it the full path to the runner and its entry point. This approach proved fragile when we attempted to switch to Yarn in PnP mode.

This PR change the way we declare the runner: we stop passing the path to the entry point and just pass its name.

Satellite PR for #4368
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #4368 (ce97804) into main (754dfc5) will not change coverage.
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4368   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.57%   93.57%           
=======================================
  Files         207      207           
  Lines        5013     5013           
  Branches     1368     1368           
=======================================
  Hits         4691     4691           
  Misses        322      322           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 93.57% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-16.x-Linux 93.57% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-18.x-Linux 93.57% <ø> (ø)
unit-tests-latest-Linux 93.57% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

dubzzz added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Up-to-now when changing the test runner used internally by Jest, we were passing it the full path to the runner and its entry point. This approach proved fragile when we attempted to switch to Yarn in PnP mode.

This PR change the way we declare the runner: we stop passing the path to the entry point and just pass its name.

Satellite PR for #4368
dubzzz added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
Up-to-now we have been importing buffer while it's a known native package in node.

So in order to avoid node from pulling its own, we were relying on path import. We switched to a way safer approach: we alias the buffer package with another name and we import it via its other name. It avoid path related hazards and let the package manager and node responsible to tell the code where to find the relevant package.

Satellite PR for #4368
@dubzzz dubzzz merged commit ff80d63 into main Oct 25, 2023
69 checks passed
@dubzzz dubzzz deleted the linker-pnp branch October 25, 2023 10:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant