migrate more callsites to the new logging library + new unwrapSdkContext #1009
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@jonfung-dydx has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe changes across multiple files in the protocol primarily involve refactoring the context handling by replacing the standard Cosmos SDK context with a custom context from the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (32)
- protocol/app/middleware/middleware.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/app/upgrades/v3.0.0/upgrade.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/app/upgrades/v4.0.0/upgrade.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.go (8 hunks)
- protocol/lib/log/constants.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/assets/keeper/grpc_query_asset.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/x/blocktime/keeper/grpc_query.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/x/blocktime/keeper/msg_server.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/blocktime/module.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/bridge/keeper/grpc_query.go (7 hunks)
- protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_acknowledge_bridges.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_complete_bridge.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_update_event_params.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_update_propose_params.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_update_safety_params.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/keeper/orders.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/keeper/process_single_match.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob.go (15 hunks)
- protocol/x/feetiers/keeper/grpc_query.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/x/feetiers/keeper/msg_server.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/perpetuals/keeper/msg_server_update_perpetual_params.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/rewards/keeper/grpc_query.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/rewards/keeper/msg_server.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/rewards/module.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/sending/keeper/msg_server_create_transfer.go (5 hunks)
- protocol/x/sending/keeper/msg_server_create_transfer_test.go (4 hunks)
- protocol/x/stats/keeper/grpc_query.go (5 hunks)
- protocol/x/stats/keeper/msg_server.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/stats/module.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/x/subaccounts/keeper/grpc_query_subaccount.go (3 hunks)
- protocol/x/vest/keeper/grpc_query.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/vest/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 84
protocol/x/rewards/keeper/grpc_query.go (2)
- 6-6: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 18-18: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_acknowledge_bridges.go (2)
- 6-6: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 16-16: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/vest/keeper/grpc_query.go (2)
- 6-6: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 19-19: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/app/upgrades/v4.0.0/upgrade.go (1)
- 9-9: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_complete_bridge.go (2)
- 7-7: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 24-24: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_update_event_params.go (2)
- 7-7: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 24-24: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_update_safety_params.go (2)
- 7-7: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 24-24: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/bridge/keeper/msg_server_update_propose_params.go (2)
- 7-7: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 24-24: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/perpetuals/keeper/msg_server_update_perpetual_params.go (2)
- 8-8: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 24-24: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/stats/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
- 9-9: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 37-37: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/rewards/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
- 9-9: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 37-37: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/blocktime/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
- 9-9: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 37-37: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/feetiers/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
- 9-9: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 37-37: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/app/middleware/middleware.go (2)
- 9-10: The import reordering and addition of a new import for
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/types/moduleis not directly related to the PR objectives but seems to be a part of general code maintenance.- 32-36: The addition of error handling and logging related to stack trace and errors aligns with the PR objectives to enhance logging capabilities.
protocol/x/feetiers/keeper/grpc_query.go (2)
- 6-6: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 26-26: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/blocktime/keeper/grpc_query.go (2)
- 6-6: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 25-25: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/subaccounts/keeper/grpc_query_subaccount.go (2)
- 8-8: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 23-23: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/assets/keeper/grpc_query_asset.go (2)
- 9-9: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 25-25: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/stats/keeper/grpc_query.go (2)
- 6-6: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 26-26: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/lib/log/constants.go (1)
- 34-36: The addition of new constants
Reason,RemovalStatus, andTotalFilledis consistent with the PR objectives to enhance logging capabilities.protocol/x/vest/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2)
- 10-10: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 123-123: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNamein the test functionTestMsgDeleteVestEntryis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/bridge/keeper/grpc_query.go (2)
- 6-6: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 26-26: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNameis consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/sending/keeper/msg_server_create_transfer.go (2)
- 10-10: The import statement for the new logging library is correct and follows the changes described in the PR objectives.
- 22-22: The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith the additional argumenttypes.ModuleNamein theCreateTransferfunction is consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping.protocol/x/stats/module.go (3)
- 8-9: The addition of
"cosmossdk.io/core/appmodule"import is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 18-18: The addition of
"github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib"import is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 150-151: The use of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwithtypes.ModuleNameas an argument in theEndBlockfunction is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.protocol/x/blocktime/module.go (3)
- 18-18: The addition of
"github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib"import is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 150-151: The use of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwithtypes.ModuleNameas an argument in theBeginBlockfunction is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 158-158: The use of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwithtypes.ModuleNameas an argument in theEndBlockfunction is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.protocol/app/upgrades/v3.0.0/upgrade.go (2)
- 21-21: The addition of
"github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib"import is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 160-160: The use of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextwith"app/upgrades"as an argument in theCreateUpgradeHandlerfunction is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.protocol/x/rewards/module.go (2)
- 10-10: The addition of
"github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/log"import is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 161-162: The replacement of the
am.keeper.Logger(sdkCtx).Errorcall withlog.ErrorLogWithErrorand the removal ofconstants.ErrorLogKeyargument is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.protocol/x/sending/keeper/msg_server_create_transfer_test.go (4)
- 9-11: The import reordering and addition of
sdkmathandlibpackages are correct and align with the PR objectives.- 103-103: The replacement of
sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx)withlib.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx, types.ModuleName)is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 167-167: The replacement of
sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx)withlib.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx, types.ModuleName)is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 227-227: The replacement of
sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx)withlib.UnwrapSDKContext(goCtx, types.ModuleName)is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.go (10)
- 8-8: The replacement of the
cosmossdk.io/logimport withgithub.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/typesis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 13-13: The addition of
"github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/log"import is correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 39-44: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 50-55: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 85-91: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 97-103: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 137-144: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 150-157: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 190-195: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.- 227-232: The updated error logging using the
logpackage fromgithub.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/lib/logis correct and aligns with the PR objectives.protocol/x/clob/keeper/process_single_match.go (1)
- 547-547: The argument passed to
off_chain_updates.CreateOrderUpdateMessagehas been changed fromk.Logger(ctx)toctx. This aligns with the PR's objective to transition to a new logging library. Ensure that theCreateOrderUpdateMessagefunction is designed to acceptctxdirectly and that it can extract the necessary logging information from the context without requiring a logger object.Verification successful
The function
CreateOrderUpdateMessageinprotocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.goindeed accepts asdk.Contextas its first argument. The snippet provided from the script output shows that the function is designed to work with the context directly, and there is a usage oflog.ErrorLogWithErrorwhich takesctxas an argument, indicating that the logging information can be extracted from the context.Based on this information, the review comment is verified to be correct. The change from
k.Logger(ctx)toctxaligns with the function's ability to handle the context for logging purposes.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that CreateOrderUpdateMessage function accepts a context and extracts logging information correctly. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func CreateOrderUpdateMessage($_, $_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Adjust the pattern to be more inclusive to match the CreateOrderUpdateMessage function regardless of the number of parameters. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func CreateOrderUpdateMessage($$$) { $$$ }'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for the CreateOrderUpdateMessage function definition in the codebase. rg "func CreateOrderUpdateMessage"Length of output: 123
Script:
#!/bin/bash # View the function signature and implementation details of CreateOrderUpdateMessage. rg -A 10 "func CreateOrderUpdateMessage" protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates.goLength of output: 429
protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob.go (15)
- 128-128: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 464-464: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 473-473: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 514-514: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 536-536: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 566-566: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 583-583: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 618-618: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 655-655: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 791-791: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 1115-1115: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 1267-1267: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 1286-1286: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 1974-1974: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.- 2100-2100: The use of
ctxdirectly in the logging function call is noted. Ensure that the context is properly initialized with the necessary logging fields before this call.
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| func CreateUpgradeHandler( | ||
| mm *module.Manager, | ||
| configurator module.Configurator, | ||
| ) upgradetypes.UpgradeHandler { | ||
| return func(ctx context.Context, plan upgradetypes.Plan, vm module.VersionMap) (module.VersionMap, error) { | ||
| sdkCtx := sdk.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx) | ||
| sdkCtx := lib.UnwrapSDKContext(ctx, "app/upgrades") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification process has found that within the protocol/app/upgrades/v4.0.0 directory, there is no definition of ModuleName that corresponds to the string "app/upgrades". The usage of "app/upgrades" in lib.UnwrapSDKContext within upgrade.go is not confirmed by any module name definition in the provided context. Therefore, the review comment questioning the correctness of the module name is substantiated.
Analysis chain
The usage of lib.UnwrapSDKContext with the additional argument "app/upgrades" is consistent with the PR objectives to standardize context unwrapping. However, ensure that "app/upgrades" is the correct module name to be used here, as it differs from the types.ModuleName used in other files.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that "app/upgrades" is the correct module name to use for context unwrapping in upgrade.go
grep -rnw 'protocol/app/upgrades' -e 'ModuleName'
Length of output: 589
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for a definition of 'ModuleName' within the 'app/upgrades' module, specifically in the v4.0.0 upgrade path.
grep -rnw 'protocol/app/upgrades/v4.0.0' -e 'ModuleName'
# Additionally, check if the string "app/upgrades" is used consistently for context unwrapping in the 'v4.0.0' upgrade path.
grep -r 'lib.UnwrapSDKContext' protocol/app/upgrades/v4.0.0/
Length of output: 282
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- protocol/x/epochs/module.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
protocol/x/epochs/module.go (1)
- 151-151: The
BeginBlockfunction now initializessdkCtxusinglib.UnwrapSDKContext. Ensure thatlib.UnwrapSDKContextis thoroughly tested and that its behavior is consistent with the expected context unwrapping required byBeginBlocker.Verification successful
The usage of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextis consistent across the codebase, as indicated by the script output. However, the script does not provide information about the thoroughness of testing or the correctness of the function's behavior. To verify these aspects, we would need to examine the tests and implementation related tolib.UnwrapSDKContext.
The test files for the
vestandsendingmodules mentionlib.UnwrapSDKContext, indicating potential test coverage. However, the implementation details oflib.UnwrapSDKContextcould not be confirmed due to the lack of output from the script searching forlib.go. To verify the implementation, we need to search for the function definition directly.
The implementation of
lib.UnwrapSDKContextis found inprotocol/lib/context.go. To verify the implementation details, we should examine the contents of this file.
The output confirms the presence of the
UnwrapSDKContextfunction inprotocol/lib/context.goand indicates that it is a wrapper around the Cosmos SDK's unwrap function. This suggests that the function's purpose is to adapt or extend the Cosmos SDK functionality, which is a common practice in software development to ensure compatibility or add additional features.Given this information, the review comment about ensuring that
lib.UnwrapSDKContextis thoroughly tested and behaves as expected is verified in terms of the function's existence and its role as a wrapper. However, without the actual body of the tests, we cannot fully verify the thoroughness of the testing. The presence of the function in test files suggests that it is likely covered by tests, but the extent of the testing is not confirmed.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that lib.UnwrapSDKContext is used consistently across the codebase. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'lib.UnwrapSDKContext($_, $_)'Length of output: 9685
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for tests related to lib.UnwrapSDKContext rg "lib.UnwrapSDKContext" --files-with-matches | xargs rg "func Test" --files-with-matches # Additionally, check the implementation of lib.UnwrapSDKContext fd "lib.go" --exec cat {} \; | rg "UnwrapSDKContext"Length of output: 247
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Attempt to find the implementation of lib.UnwrapSDKContext by searching for the function definition rg "func UnwrapSDKContext" --files-with-matchesLength of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine the contents of context.go to verify the implementation of lib.UnwrapSDKContext cat protocol/lib/context.go | rg "UnwrapSDKContext"Length of output: 184
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 52
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (8)
- protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates_test.go (8 hunks)
- protocol/testutil/memclob/offchain_updates.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/e2e/long_term_orders_test.go (10 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/e2e/short_term_orders_test.go (6 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_place_order_reduce_only_test.go (2 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_place_order_test.go (5 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_place_perpetual_liquidation_test.go (1 hunks)
- protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_test_util.go (17 hunks)
Additional comments: 21
protocol/testutil/memclob/offchain_updates.go (1)
- 28-28: The change correctly aligns with the PR's objective of enhancing logging capabilities and standardizing context handling by directly using the
sdk.Contextwithout extracting the logger.protocol/indexer/off_chain_updates/off_chain_updates_test.go (8)
- 16-16: The import of the new
sdkpackage aligns with the PR's objective to standardize context handling by using a consistent method for creating contexts in test functions.- 70-72: The usage of
sdk.NewSdkContextWithMultistore()to create a context for test functions aligns with the PR's objective to standardize context handling. This change is consistent across various test functions.- 87-89: The consistent use of
sdk.NewSdkContextWithMultistore()in test setup demonstrates the PR's objective to standardize context handling across the application.- 102-105: The application of
sdk.NewSdkContextWithMultistore()for context creation in test functions is in line with the PR's goal of standardizing context handling.- 123-132: The use of
sdk.NewSdkContextWithMultistore()for creating a context in this test function is consistent with the PR's objective to standardize context handling.- 151-153: The consistent application of
sdk.NewSdkContextWithMultistore()for context creation in test functions aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing context handling.- 172-179: The use of
sdk.NewSdkContextWithMultistore()for creating a context in this test function aligns with the PR's objective to standardize context handling.- 191-194: The consistent application of
sdk.NewSdkContextWithMultistore()for context creation in test functions aligns with the PR's goal of standardizing context handling.protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_place_perpetual_liquidation_test.go (1)
- 556-556: The addition of the
ctxparameter to theassertPlacePerpetualLiquidationOffchainMessagesfunction call aligns with the PR's objective to standardize context handling across the application.protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_test_util.go (11)
- 1326-1326: The function
assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessagesuses a hardcodedOrderRemovalReasonandOrderRemoveV1_ORDER_REMOVAL_STATUS_BEST_EFFORT_CANCELEDfor generating anOrderRemovemessage. Ensure this logic aligns with the intended behavior for all scenarios where it's used.- 1339-1339: In
assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages, theMustCreateOrderPlaceMessagefunction is called without checking if the order placement should indeed generate anOrderPlacemessage for all cases. Validate that this assumption holds true for all test scenarios.- 1355-1355: The loop in
assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessagesthat generatesOrderRemovemessages for expectedCancelledReduceOnlyOrders might not account for all scenarios. Specifically, it assumes all such orders will have a message generated, which might not be true if the order cancellation logic changes.- 1421-1421: The function
assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessagesassumes that allexpectedNewMatchesshould generate anOrderUpdatemessage for the maker order. This might not cover cases where matches do not alter the state in a way that requires an update message. Confirm this logic is correct.- 1442-1442: The handling of reduce-only order removals after matching in
assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessagesmight not correctly account for all scenarios, especially if the logic for determining when these orders are cancelled changes. Ensure this is consistently verified across all test cases.- 1458-1458: In
assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages, the generation of anOrderUpdatemessage for the placed order is conditional on the order status being successful. This might not account for scenarios where an update is needed despite an unsuccessful status. Review this logic for completeness.- 1474-1474: The generation of an
OrderRemovemessage inassertPlaceOrderOffchainMessagesbased on the order status and error type might not cover all scenarios where an order should be removed. Specifically, this logic might not account for new error types or status codes that require different handling.- 1503-1503: In
getExpectedPlacePerpetualLiquidationOffchainMessages, the logic for generating expected off-chain messages for a liquidation order does not explicitly handle scenarios where the liquidation order's behavior might differ from standard orders. Ensure this function accurately reflects the unique aspects of liquidation orders.- 1541-1541: In
getExpectedPlacePerpetualLiquidationOffchainMessages, the logic for generatingOrderRemovemessages for self-trades during liquidation might not account for all relevant scenarios. Specifically, it assumes all such orders will be removed, which might not hold if the liquidation logic changes.- 1556-1556: The generation of
OrderRemovemessages for orders failing collateralization checks ingetExpectedPlacePerpetualLiquidationOffchainMessagesmight not be comprehensive. This logic assumes a direct mapping between order index and collateralization check failures, which could lead to inaccuracies if the underlying assumptions change.- 1582-1582: In
getExpectedPlacePerpetualLiquidationOffchainMessages, the assumption that all matches with maker orders should result in anOrderUpdatemessage might not hold in all scenarios, especially if the matching logic or the criteria for sending update messages change.
| @@ -1372,6 +1372,7 @@ func TestPlaceOrder_ReduceOnly(t *testing.T) { | |||
| // Verify the correct offchain update messages were returned. | |||
| assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages( | |||
| t, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The ctx parameter is added to the assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function call but not used within the function definition. Ensure the function utilizes this new parameter appropriately or remove it if unnecessary.
| @@ -1655,6 +1656,7 @@ | |||
| // Verify the correct offchain update messages were returned. | |||
| assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages( | |||
| t, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similar to the previous comment, the ctx parameter is added to the assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function call in the TestPlaceOrder_LongTermReduceOnlyRemovals test function but not used within the function definition. Verify the necessity of this parameter.
| @@ -68,14 +68,14 @@ func TestPlaceOrder(t *testing.T) { | |||
| orders: []clobtypes.MsgPlaceOrder{PlaceOrder_Alice_Num0_Id0_Clob0_Buy5_Price10_GTB20}, | |||
| expectedOffchainMessagesAfterPlaceOrder: []msgsender.Message{ | |||
| off_chain_updates.MustCreateOrderPlaceMessage( | |||
| nil, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace ctx with a more specific context or add documentation explaining why the broad ctx is used here.
| PlaceOrder_Alice_Num0_Id0_Clob0_Buy5_Price10_GTB20.Order, | ||
| ).AddHeader(msgsender.MessageHeader{ | ||
| Key: msgsender.TransactionHashHeaderKey, | ||
| Value: tmhash.Sum(CheckTx_PlaceOrder_Alice_Num0_Id0_Buy5_Price10_GTB20.Tx), | ||
| }), | ||
| off_chain_updates.MustCreateOrderUpdateMessage( | ||
| nil, | ||
| ctx, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace ctx with a more specific context or add documentation explaining why the broad ctx is used here.
| @@ -100,37 +100,37 @@ | |||
| }, | |||
| expectedOffchainMessagesAfterPlaceOrder: []msgsender.Message{ | |||
| off_chain_updates.MustCreateOrderPlaceMessage( | |||
| nil, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace ctx with a more specific context or add documentation explaining why the broad ctx is used here.
| @@ -395,6 +395,7 @@ func TestPlaceOrder_AddOrderToOrderbook(t *testing.T) { | |||
| // Verify the correct offchain update messages were returned. | |||
| assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages( | |||
| t, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function is called with ctx as a parameter, but the function definition does not require or use ctx. This is unnecessary and could be misleading.
| @@ -2291,6 +2292,7 @@ | |||
| // Verify the correct offchain update messages were returned. | |||
| assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages( | |||
| t, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function is called with ctx as a parameter, but the function definition does not require or use ctx. This is unnecessary and could be misleading.
| @@ -3286,6 +3288,7 @@ | |||
| // Verify the correct offchain update messages were returned. | |||
| assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages( | |||
| t, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function is called with ctx as a parameter, but the function definition does not require or use ctx. This is unnecessary and could be misleading.
| @@ -3428,6 +3431,7 @@ | |||
| // Verify the correct offchain update messages were returned. | |||
| assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages( | |||
| t, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function is called with ctx as a parameter, but the function definition does not require or use ctx. This is unnecessary and could be misleading.
| @@ -4101,6 +4105,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages( | |||
| t, | |||
| ctx, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function is called with ctx as a parameter, but the function definition does not require or use ctx. This is unnecessary and could be misleading.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It does, though, in memclob_test_util.go line 1305.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jonfung-dydx, thank you for pointing out the specific usage of ctx within the assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages function. Based on the script output, it's clear that ctx is indeed a parameter of the function, as shown in the function signature within memclob_test_util.go. This confirms that my initial comment was incorrect, and I appreciate your correction on this matter.
The context (ctx) is used as part of the function's parameters to ensure that the function can perform its intended operations, which may involve context-specific actions such as accessing values stored in the context or performing logging that requires context information.
Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I apologize for the oversight.
Analysis chain
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the usage of `ctx` within the `assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages` function in `memclob_test_util.go`.
sed -n '1295,1315p' protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_test_util.go
Length of output: 1097
New Learnings Added
User: jonfung-dydx
PR: dydxprotocol/v4-chain#1009
File: protocol/x/clob/memclob/memclob_place_order_test.go:4108-4108
Timestamp: 2024-02-05T20:01:55.204Z
Learning: The `assertPlaceOrderOffchainMessages` function in `memclob_test_util.go` indeed requires `ctx` as a parameter for its operations, contrary to the initial comment made.
…ext (#1009) * migrate more callsites to the new logging library + new unwrapSdkContext * context after defer from previous PR * fix callsites for offchain update loggers * fix log error with optional context tests and callsites * lint
Second part of #1003 . Migrate everything else