Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DEC-2201] Ensure that we use the client context with AutoCLI #966

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 16, 2024

Conversation

lcwik
Copy link
Contributor

@lcwik lcwik commented Jan 16, 2024

Changelist

[DEC-2201] Ensure that we use the client context with AutoCLI

Note that the basis of this code is from https://github.com/dydxprotocol/cosmos-sdk/blob/b48250d4e0efacbd40f3e0b980c1e1004d29e351/simapp/simd/cmd/root.go#L103 which is linked from the Cosmos 0.50 upgrade guide.

Test Plan

Added unit test.

Author/Reviewer Checklist

  • If this PR has changes that result in a different app state given the same prior state and transaction list, manually add the state-breaking label.
  • If the PR has breaking postgres changes to the indexer add the indexer-postgres-breaking label.
  • If this PR isn't state-breaking but has changes that modify behavior in PrepareProposal or ProcessProposal, manually add the label proposal-breaking.
  • If this PR is one of many that implement a specific feature, manually label them all feature:[feature-name].
  • If you wish to for mergify-bot to automatically create a PR to backport your change to a release branch, manually add the label backport/[branch-name].
  • Manually add any of the following labels: refactor, chore, bug.

Copy link

linear bot commented Jan 16, 2024

DEC-2201

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The update involves initializing client context within the dydxprotocold CLI application and ensuring proper error handling by panicking on failure. Additionally, a new test has been added to ensure that the command-line interface correctly utilizes client configuration settings, demonstrated by a test case that checks the CLI's response to a configured fake address.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root.go Introduced homeDir parameter, initialized client context, and added panic on initialization error.
.../cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root_test.go Added test to verify client configuration usage within the CLI.
.../cmd/dydxprotocold/main.go Added app.DefaultNodeHome argument to NewRootCmd function call.
.../testing/containertest/node.go Imported github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/app and modified NewRootCmd function call.
.../testutil/app/app.go Added validatorHomeDir as an argument to NewRootCmdWithInterceptors function call.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0fd276 and a5b0317.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root_test.go (1)
  • 12-36: The test TestNewRootCmd_UsesClientConfig is well-structured and follows best practices for setting up a temporary environment, configuring the client context, and asserting the expected behavior.

Comment on lines +148 to +151
initClientCtx, err := config.ReadFromClientConfig(initClientCtx)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using panic for error handling is not recommended as it can cause the program to terminate unexpectedly. Consider handling the error gracefully and providing a way to recover or exit cleanly.

- panic(err)
+ return nil, err

Committable suggestion

IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
initClientCtx, err := config.ReadFromClientConfig(initClientCtx)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
initClientCtx, err := config.ReadFromClientConfig(initClientCtx)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5b0317 and 79e8925.
Files selected for processing (5)
  • protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root.go (4 hunks)
  • protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root_test.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/main.go (1 hunks)
  • protocol/testing/containertest/node.go (2 hunks)
  • protocol/testutil/app/app.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root.go
  • protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root_test.go
Additional comments: 4
protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/main.go (1)
  • 16-16: The addition of app.DefaultNodeHome to the NewRootCmd function call should be verified to ensure that it aligns with the Cosmos 0.50 upgrade guide and that all references to NewRootCmd throughout the codebase have been updated accordingly.
Verification successful

---



---

The search results from `ripgrep` show several instances of `NewRootCmd` and `NewRootCmdWithInterceptors` being used in the codebase. The relevant files and lines are:

- `protocol/testutil/app/app.go`: `NewRootCmdWithInterceptors` is used, but the arguments are not shown.
- `protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/main.go`: `NewRootCmd` is used with `option, app.DefaultNodeHome`.
- `protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root_test.go`: Multiple tests use `NewRootCmd` with `option, tempDir`.
- `protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root.go`: Definitions for `NewRootCmd` and `NewRootCmdWithInterceptors` are present.
- `protocol/testing/containertest/node.go`: `NewRootCmd` is used with `option, app.DefaultNodeHome`.

From the output, we can see that `NewRootCmd` is indeed used with the new argument `app.DefaultNodeHome` in `main.go` and `node.go`. In `root_test.go`, the function is used with a `tempDir` argument for testing purposes, which is expected behavior for unit tests. The definitions in `root.go` indicate where the function is declared.

Based on this information, it appears that the addition of `app.DefaultNodeHome` to the `NewRootCmd` function call has been implemented correctly where required, and the test cases have been adjusted to use a temporary directory as expected.



</details>

<details>
<summary>Scripts Executed</summary>

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:



---

Script:
```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the NewRootCmd function usage across the codebase to ensure the new argument is added everywhere.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRootCmd($_, $_)'

Length of output: 51



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the NewRootCmd function usage across the codebase to ensure the new argument is added everywhere.
# The pattern is modified to capture any number of arguments after the first one.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRootCmd($_, $$$)'

Length of output: 52



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use ripgrep to search for the string "NewRootCmd" to find all instances of its usage in the codebase.
rg 'NewRootCmd' --go

Length of output: 449



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Correcting the ripgrep command to search for "NewRootCmd" in Go files using the appropriate glob pattern.
rg 'NewRootCmd' -g '*.go'

Length of output: 991

protocol/testing/containertest/node.go (2)
  • 6-6: The new import github.com/dydxprotocol/v4-chain/protocol/app is correctly added to use app.DefaultNodeHome.
  • 108-108: The modification of the NewRootCmd function call by adding app.DefaultNodeHome as an argument should be verified to ensure that it is consistent with the changes made in main.go and that it does not break any existing functionality.
Verification successful

The output from the rg command confirms the presence of the NewRootCmd function in multiple files within the codebase. Specifically, it is used in protocol/testutil/app/app.go, protocol/testing/containertest/node.go, protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/main.go, and several times in protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root_test.go. The function is also defined in protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root.go.

From the output, we can see that the NewRootCmd function is indeed called with two arguments in protocol/testing/containertest/node.go and protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/main.go, which aligns with the changes described in the PR objectives and the AI-generated summary. The addition of app.DefaultNodeHome as an argument in these calls is consistent across the files where NewRootCmd is used.

Given this information, we can conclude that the modification of the NewRootCmd function call by adding app.DefaultNodeHome as an argument is consistent with the changes made in main.go and is used correctly in the context of the protocol/testing/containertest/node.go file.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the NewRootCmd function usage within the testing context to ensure the new argument is added and used correctly.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRootCmd($_, $_)'

Length of output: 51



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the NewRootCmd function usage within the codebase to ensure the new argument is added and used correctly.
# We will look for any number of arguments to capture all usages of the function.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRootCmd($$$)'

Length of output: 48



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Use ripgrep to search for the string "NewRootCmd" within Go files to confirm its presence and usage.
rg 'NewRootCmd' --type go

Length of output: 991

protocol/testutil/app/app.go (1)
  • 1200-1200: The addition of validatorHomeDir to the NewRootCmdWithInterceptors function call should be verified to ensure that it is consistent with the changes made in main.go and node.go, and that it does not introduce any breaking changes or inconsistencies.
Verification successful

---


The review of the NewRootCmdWithInterceptors function usage in root.go confirms that the homeDir parameter is used as intended and aligns with the changes described in the PR. The addition of validatorHomeDir as an argument is consistent with the function's definition and usage, and there are no indications of breaking changes or inconsistencies from the provided context.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the NewRootCmdWithInterceptors function usage to ensure the new argument is added and used correctly.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRootCmdWithInterceptors($_, $_, $_)'

Length of output: 71



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the NewRootCmdWithInterceptors function definition and usage to ensure the new argument is added and used correctly.
# We will use a pattern that allows for a variable number of arguments.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'NewRootCmdWithInterceptors($$$)'

Length of output: 898



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the surrounding code in root.go where NewRootCmdWithInterceptors is called to understand the assignment of homeDir.
rg "NewRootCmdWithInterceptors" -C 10 ./protocol/cmd/dydxprotocold/cmd/root.go

Length of output: 1120

@lcwik lcwik merged commit 3035168 into main Jan 16, 2024
17 checks passed
@lcwik lcwik deleted the lukedec2201 branch January 16, 2024 20:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants