Limit check to modules directory #300
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Easy fix.
@n0x08 created the issue #297 because after running EMBA with the log dir set inside the EMBA directory he found out, that the reference links to some other modules were wrong in the webreport.
Why? It is possible to add
[REF]tags to modules in the output of EMBA and the webreport generation script checks then for the modules (previously in the main directory of EMBA with ignoring of the file ending) if they exists. There it found the old log files instead of the modules and linked to them and therefore created the mess.No wrong links anymore if there are old log files in the EMBA directory.