Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Switch to GCC 9.3.0 for foss/2020a and intel/2020a release #10072

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Mar 17, 2020
Merged

Switch to GCC 9.3.0 for foss/2020a and intel/2020a release #10072

merged 7 commits into from Mar 17, 2020

Conversation

akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

(created using eb --new-pr)

@akesandgren akesandgren added this to In progress in 2020a via automation Mar 16, 2020
@akesandgren akesandgren added this to the 2020a milestone Mar 16, 2020
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 16, 2020

@akesandgren You'll need to move a couple deps from GCCcore/9.2.0 to GCCcore/9.3.0:

EasyBuildError: 'Missing dependencies: bzip2/1.0.8-gompi-2020a-rc3, Python/3.8.2-foss-2020a-rc3, zlib/1.2.11-gompi-2020a-rc3, pybind11/2.4.3-foss-2020a-rc3-Python-3.8.2, foss/2020a-rc3, XZ/5.2.4-gompi-2020a-rc3, gompi/2020a-rc3 (no easyconfig file or existing module found)'

@zao
Copy link
Contributor

zao commented Mar 16, 2020

Test report by @zao
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in this PR)
freja - Linux ubuntu 18.04, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz, Python 2.7.17
See https://gist.github.com/d53568ab69c08ea0f9fe857e394d6c2b for a full test report.

@akesandgren akesandgren changed the title Switch to GCC 9.3.0 for foss/2020a release Switch to GCC 9.3.0 for foss/2020a release (WIP, pending some more GCCcore-9.2.0 -> 9.3.0 easyconfigs) Mar 16, 2020
@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in this PR)
b-an04.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux ubuntu 16.04, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.12
See https://gist.github.com/550e12f192974d4671265602555f56f1 for a full test report.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (6 easyconfigs in this PR)
skalman.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux ubuntu 18.04, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz, Python 2.7.17
See https://gist.github.com/16e3d0d822eef8b28e74710d6e209007 for a full test report.

@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 17, 2020
@boegel boegel mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2020
Closed
@akesandgren akesandgren changed the title Switch to GCC 9.3.0 for foss/2020a release (WIP, pending some more GCCcore-9.2.0 -> 9.3.0 easyconfigs) Switch to GCC 9.3.0 for foss/2020a and intel/2020a release Mar 17, 2020
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 17, 2020
@easybuilders easybuilders deleted a comment from boegelbot Mar 17, 2020
@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 16 out of 16 (15 easyconfigs in this PR)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/734ae078f4b1ac61343f3683e22dc116 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/51b4861187e7e2a907dc40bf4f38e3be for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
bber0501u03a.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/29f37947407161ce41539bd5dbe493dd for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 10 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
bear-pg0306u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 7.6, 8335-GTX, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/83f6c2e2d0d5fa80a05ff76a7cf0b493 for a full test report.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

@branfosj It looks like you didn't do --rebuild on those test reports, there are 16 ECs in this PR not 10...

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

And somethings odd with the report from @migueldiascosta too, it says 15 EC in the PR

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

@akesandgren In the test rerports above I've built the non-Intel items. There'll be a further couple of test reports to follow that will just do the Intel items.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 17, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 16 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2491.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/227f97b198809797f81dec258eb26406 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 6 out of 6 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
bber0501u03a.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/5e84d78e0cfef85c8026d2ca17c59870 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 17, 2020

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 16 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
generoso - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 v4 @ 2.00GHz, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/56b676771bdd358e7d8b5c93127b7ed2 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 8 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
bb2c1a09.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/006af422f78e8a8f17c10f0f00ad81a8 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 8 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in this PR)
bb2c1a09.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/006af422f78e8a8f17c10f0f00ad81a8 for a full test report.

This faliure can be ignored. Someone set off two builds of the same item at the same time ...

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 17, 2020

Going in, thanks @akesandgren!

boegel
boegel approved these changes Mar 17, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm calling this, we have plenty of successful test reports now imho...

@branfosj Keep those additional test reports coming!

2020a automation moved this from In progress to Reviewer approved Mar 17, 2020
@boegel boegel merged commit af945bd into easybuilders:2020a Mar 17, 2020
2020a automation moved this from Reviewer approved to Done Mar 17, 2020
@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

akesandgren commented Mar 17, 2020 •
edited

Test report by @akesandgren
FAILED
Build succeeded for 15 out of 21 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
skalman.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux ubuntu 18.04, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8565U CPU @ 1.80GHz, Python 2.7.17
See https://gist.github.com/2da78969746b0af622d6ed8033a712ea for a full test report.

Fails due to Eigen@ SYSTEM -> CMake-3.6.9-GCCcore-8.3.0 -> ncurses-5.9@SYSTEM -> fail with a gcc 7.5 system compiler

@akesandgren akesandgren deleted the 20200316153808_new_pr_HPL23 branch March 17, 2020 13:22
@zao
Copy link
Contributor

zao commented Mar 17, 2020

Test report by @zao
FAILED
Build succeeded for 13 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
freja - Linux ubuntu 18.04, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8700K CPU @ 3.70GHz, Python 2.7.17
See https://gist.github.com/bafc256f2236453a464b123b86ff1c59 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented Mar 17, 2020

Test report by @lexming
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 16 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
login2.cerberus.os - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6126 CPU @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/760b5a600714765130788f371cdf0fd6 for a full test report.

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test report by @akesandgren
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 16 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
b-an04.hpc2n.umu.se - Linux ubuntu 16.04, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.12
See https://gist.github.com/e31ab19df6e04a391186ceb104f51c68 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 12 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
bb2c1a09.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ccceb81b8afe6d826e29a6ce34227c9a for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 12 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
bb2c1a09.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/ccceb81b8afe6d826e29a6ce34227c9a for a full test report.

Argh... That is a filesystem related error. I.e. it can also be ignored.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 16 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
bb2c1a09.bb2.cluster - Linux centos linux 7.7.1908, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2660 0 @ 2.20GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/86f204c539a6f65cf779ebda6848916d for a full test report.

@migueldiascosta
Copy link
Member

Test report by @migueldiascosta
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 16 out of 16 (16 easyconfigs in this PR)
sms - Linux centos linux 7.6.1810, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/cb3dc82320de8c9407fabe84176405d2 for a full test report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@boegel boegel boegel approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
update
Projects
No open projects
2020a
  
Done
Milestone
2020a
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
6 participants
@akesandgren @boegel @zao @migueldiascosta @branfosj @lexming