Cuby 4 #1258
Cuby 4 #1258
Conversation
|
Automatic reply from Jenkins: Can I test this? |
| to their results, making it easy to create new computational | ||
| protocols by combining existing blocks of the framework.""" | ||
|
|
||
| toolchain = {'name': 'dummy', 'version': 'dummy'} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
why the dummy toolchain? Remember, if the version is also dummy, dependencies are not loaded
There was a problem hiding this comment.
+1
I would even go as far as using a non-dummy toolchain here, since you're picking a toolchain anyway when specifying the dependency
that'll make it clear that this module will also result in loaded intel/2014b
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I do not rally mind to add the toolchain, but anyway, it is a packed binary. So in theory it does not need a toochain. This is why I have chosen to add a dummy toolchain. Anyway, I will put intel/2014b.
|
ok to test |
|
Test FAILed. |
|
Jenkins: test this please |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
@hajgato: since there's no 'proper' version, should we add a checksum for the source tarball? |
|
@hagato informed me that licensing info is included in the tarball, so checksum is not an option Fine, merging this in then, looks fine. |
depends on #1233