-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 701
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{lib}[GCCcore/10.3.0] Mesa v21.1.1, LLVM v11.1.0, Mako v1.1.4, ... w/ Python 3.9.5 #12943
{lib}[GCCcore/10.3.0] Mesa v21.1.1, LLVM v11.1.0, Mako v1.1.4, ... w/ Python 3.9.5 #12943
Conversation
…e-10.3.0.eb, Mako-1.1.4-GCCcore-10.3.0.eb, libdrm-2.4.106-GCCcore-10.3.0.eb, libglvnd-1.3.3-GCCcore-10.3.0.eb, libunwind-1.4.0-GCCcore-10.3.0.eb
Test report by @boegel |
@boegelbot please test @ generoso |
@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on generoso PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 847268139 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we consider holding back the LLVM version a bit for better compatibility with e.g. numba
(I don't see that we use LLVM for anything else really)
We would need to use LLVM 10.x then (or even 9.x on Someone in Slack was recently looking into statically linking LLVM into |
It looks like @fizwit got |
It builds and passes sanity, could use more testing
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:22 PM Kenneth Hoste ***@***.***> wrote:
It looks like @fizwit <https://github.com/fizwit> got numba to work on
top of LLVM 11.0.1 though, see
https://github.com/FredHutch/easybuild-life-sciences/blob/master/fh_easyconfigs/n/numba/numba-0.53.1-fosscuda-2020b.eb
...
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12943 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHC3S66TA57AQJQPWVBFJTTPKRNTANCNFSM45NS6INA>
.
--
John Dey
***@***.***
|
Test report by @boegel |
Test report by @boegel |
…asyconfigs into 20210524190740_new_pr_Mesa2111
Note that using LLVM 11.1.0 here is (deliberately) conservative, since LLVM 12.0.0 is available already too... @fizwit Did you run any test suites for |
I should mention that llvmlite has a tracking issue for llvm 12 support already as well, so maybe they plan to skip 11 |
More testing is needed
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:31 AM Kenneth Hoste ***@***.***> wrote:
Note that using LLVM 11.1.0 here is (deliberately) conservative, since
LLVM 12.0.0 is available already too...
@fizwit <https://github.com/fizwit> Did you run any test suites for
llvmlite + numba on top of LLVM 11.x?
It seems like the patch may not be enough, based on the feedback in
numba/llvmlite#639 <numba/llvmlite#639> ...
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12943 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHC3S4LKOH3GBVNYUAIHG3TPOYFHANCNFSM45NS6INA>
.
--
John Dey
***@***.***
|
Test report by @verdurin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine.
Going in, thanks @boegel! |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)requires
#12939(X11)