{math}[foss/2022a,GCCcore/11.3.0] sagemath v10.1 and dependencies

[migueldiascosta]

(created using eb --new-pr)

requires:

• {math}[GCCcore/11.3.0] PARI-GP v2.15.4 #19198
• {math}[gfbf/2022a] LinBox v1.7.0 #19202
• {math}[foss/2022a] gap v4.12.2 #19207
• {math}[GCC/11.3.0] BRiAl v1.2.12, m4ri v20200125, m4rie v20200125 #19208
• {math}[GCC/11.3.0] eclib v20230424 #19209
• {math}[GCCcore/11.3.0] cliquer v1.21 #19210
• {lang}[GCCcore/11.3.0] ECL v23.9.9 #19211
• {math}[gfbf/2022a] giac v1.9.0-69 + build shared library for cliquer #19323
• {math}[GCCcore/11.3.0] SYMMETRICA v2.0 #19328
• {math}[GCCcore/11.3.0] lcalc v2.0.5 #19329
• {tools}[GCCcore/11.3.0] cysignals v1.11.2, ppl v1.2, pplpy v0.8.9 #19349
• {math}[GCCcore/11.3.0] primecountpy v0.1.0, primecount v7.9 #19370
• {math}[GCCcore/11.3.0,foss/2022a] fpylll v0.5.9, fplll v5.4.5 #19371

This installation method for sagemath is based on https://github.com/sagemath/sage#alternative-installation-using-pypi, but providing the mandatory dependencies via eb instead of downloading and building all the dependencies via sage_conf (which of course turned out to be a rabbit hole...)

For those with an itch to scratch, an easyconfig which lets sage_conf download and build all the deps is in #19213

[migueldiascosta]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@migueldiascosta: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19212 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19212 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 12261

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1826618069 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[jfgrimm]

Test report by @jfgrimm
FAILED
Build succeeded for 13 out of 14 (6 easyconfigs in total)
node040.viking2.yor.alces.network - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7643 48-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/jfgrimm/308548204c1f478961198c34a705d3c4 for a full test report.

[migueldiascosta]

@jfgrimm I think that particular failure is because the lcalc dependency is missing from the sagemath easyconfig in this PR, I'll add it, but even then this is still a draft, not quite ready yet

I could flesh out a few more easyconfigs (e.g. libbraiding, libhomfly, planarity and rankwidth) into separate PRs though, if you're willing to review them separately, to simplify reviewing this PR later

[migueldiascosta]

Test report by @migueldiascosta
FAILED
Build succeeded for 9 out of 10 (10 easyconfigs in total)
sms - Linux CentOS Linux 7.6.1810, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core Processor, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/migueldiascosta/d7d852b86a7b7ef5a6342c15507a2575 for a full test report.

[migueldiascosta]

sanity check command python -c 'from sage.all import *' exited with code -11

this works for #19213 though, so something here is still not right

[boegel]

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19212 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19212 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 13255

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2039652673 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegel]

Just so you know: @PetrKralCZ is making a big effort on SageMath with foss/2023b currently, and he's getting close it seems, see vscentrum/vsc-software-stack#253 + https://github.com/vscentrum/vsc-software-stack/tree/wip/253_Sagemath_plantri. PR coming soon, hopefully...