Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

{lang}[gfbf/2023.09] SciPy-bundle v2023.11 #19318

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023
Merged

{lang}[gfbf/2023.09] SciPy-bundle v2023.11 #19318

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 27, 2023

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Nov 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

@boegel boegel added the update label Nov 24, 2023
@boegel boegel force-pushed the 20231124215207_new_pr_SciPy-bundle202311 branch from ac3679f to d6d159b Compare November 24, 2023 20:59
@boegel boegel changed the title requires: * https://github.com/easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks/pull/3041 * #19317 {lang}[gfbf/2023.09] SciPy-bundle v2023.11 Nov 24, 2023
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (4.9.0?) milestone Nov 24, 2023
@boegelbot

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Nov 24, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ generoso
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3041"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=19318 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3041" EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_19318 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 12249

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1826103283 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Nov 24, 2023

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3041
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node3144.skitty.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz (skylake_avx512), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/fee3a250fa1ce4a3be673b4bdbc05eb0 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3041
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
cns2 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/481781d20124aed288f9f912106d6156 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Nov 24, 2023

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2
EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3041"

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=19318 EB_ARGS="--include-easyblocks-from-pr 3041" EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_19318 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 3797

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1826129015 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3041
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/0c5e885f891eaaa719856f7a497837d2 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3041
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 9 out of 9 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/89d420e9dd246d6d7f0026b5b39d0227 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Nov 26, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Test report by @boegel
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3041
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
aarch64-neoverse-v1-node2.int.aws-rocky88-202310.eessi.io - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (neoverse_n1), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/1ffbb5630cafecc6112744a3f4a579d3 for a full test report.

edit: handful of failing tests on aarch64, which is not a surprise, not a blocker for this PR

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Nov 26, 2023

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
node4203.shinx.os - Linux RHEL 8.8, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor (x86_64_v4), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/e8f99b8334081bb9d570a68cdf1ef2c0 for a full test report.

akesandgren
akesandgren approved these changes Nov 27, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@akesandgren akesandgren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@akesandgren
Copy link
Contributor

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@akesandgren akesandgren merged commit ee57c20 into easybuilders:develop Nov 27, 2023
9 checks passed
@boegel boegel deleted the 20231124215207_new_pr_SciPy-bundle202311 branch November 27, 2023 16:33
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3041
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jrc0880.jureca - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8452Y (sapphirerapids), 4 x NVIDIA NVIDIA H100 PCIe, 535.104.12, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/eac5a313e6631a99349497bda4ad6c77 for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
Using easyblocks from PR(s) easybuilders/easybuild-easyblocks#3041
FAILED
Build succeeded for 2 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in total)
jrc0871.jureca - Linux Rocky Linux 8.8, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (neoverse_n1), 2 x NVIDIA NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB, 535.104.12, Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/4a694a7e72c2b7435910fc630633145f for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 53 out of 54 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0207u20a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480CL (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/3001cc3ba68e24f924ec7d0eb77468a2 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 57 out of 57 (3 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0208u26a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor (x86_64_v4), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/3af518af26c7697ed9d0118d0eb49e95 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented Nov 28, 2023 •
edited by boegel
Loading 

/rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/EL8-spr/software/binutils/2.40-GCCcore-13.2.0/bin/ld: build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-311/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.11/numpy/core/src/npysort/simd_qsort_16bit.dispatch.avx512_icl.o: in function `void avx512_qsort<_Float16>(_Float16*, long)':
/dev/shm/branfosj/build-up-EL8/SciPybundle/2023.11/gfbf-2023.09/numpy/numpy-1.26.2/numpy/core/src/npysort/x86-simd-sort/src/avx512fp16-16bit-qsort.hpp:161: multiple definition of `void avx512_qsort<_Float16>(_Float16*, long)'; build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-311/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.11/numpy/core/src/npysort/simd_qsort_16bit.dispatch.avx512_spr.o:/dev/shm/branfosj/build-up-EL8/SciPybundle/2023.11/gfbf-2023.09/numpy/numpy-1.26.2/numpy/core/src/npysort/x86-simd-sort/src/avx512fp16-16bit-qsort.hpp:161: first defined here                     
/rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/EL8-spr/software/binutils/2.40-GCCcore-13.2.0/bin/ld: build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-311/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.11/numpy/core/src/npysort/simd_qsort_16bit.dispatch.avx512_icl.o: in function `void avx512_qselect<_Float16>(_Float16*, long, long)':
/dev/shm/branfosj/build-up-EL8/SciPybundle/2023.11/gfbf-2023.09/numpy/numpy-1.26.2/numpy/core/src/npysort/x86-simd-sort/src/avx512fp16-16bit-qsort.hpp:149: multiple definition of `void avx512_qselect<_Float16>(_Float16*, long, long)'; build/temp.linux-x86_64-cpython-311/build/src.linux-x86_64-3.11/numpy/core/src/npysort/simd_qsort_16bit.dispatch.avx512_spr.o:/dev/shm/branfosj/build-up-EL8/SciPybundle/2023.11/gfbf-2023.09/numpy/numpy-1.26.2/numpy/core/src/npysort/x86-simd-sort/src/avx512fp16-16bit-qsort.hpp:149: first defined here             
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

see numpy/numpy#25274

This was referenced Dec 14, 2023
Merged
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@akesandgren akesandgren akesandgren approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
2023b update
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.9.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@boegel @boegelbot @branfosj @akesandgren @SebastianAchilles