-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 686
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
{vis}[foss/2023a] napari v0.4.19.post1, VisPy v0.14.1 w/ Python v3.11.3 #19664
{vis}[foss/2023a] napari v0.4.19.post1, VisPy v0.14.1 w/ Python v3.11.3 #19664
Conversation
…ydantic v2.5.3 w/ Python v3.11.3
see also: #19652 |
remove download_dep_fail
…s-2023a.eb 0.4.19rc3 -> 0.4.19
add checksum for pydantic_compat
update napari-plugin-engine2 to version 0.7.4
adjust dependency imageio to ver 2.33.1
@ThomasHoffmann77 can you fix the conflicts please? |
|
@jfgrimm I downgraded the VisPy dependency from 0.14.1 to 0.12.2 since there was a conflict with the napari 0.4.18 easyconfig. Preferably I'd like to keep the newer version of VisPy. |
Test report by @ThomasHoffmann77 |
Test report by @ThomasHoffmann77 |
Test report by @ThomasHoffmann77 |
Test report by @ThomasHoffmann77 |
fix python shebang
Test report by @ThomasHoffmann77 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry for not looking at this again sooner
Test report by @jfgrimm |
Co-authored-by: Jasper Grimm <65227842+jfgrimm@users.noreply.github.com>
@boegelbot: please test @ generoso |
@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 2115485749 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @jfgrimm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM (just waiting on the bot reports + CI)
Test report by @boegelbot |
jsc-zen3 build failed with:
|
@boegelbot: please test @ generoso |
@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 2117145510 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
I've traced the difference between my installations and the bots to the following PR: #20511 |
@boegelbot: please test @ generoso |
@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on login1 PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 2117669847 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
@boegelbot: please test @ jsc-zen3 |
@jfgrimm are the sanity pip check messages about missing hatchling related to 20546 and jupyter-server? |
@jfgrimm: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de PR test command '
Test results coming soon (I hope)... - notification for comment with ID 2117694597 processed Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me, |
Test report by @boegelbot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
will merge once #20553 is merged
Going in, thanks @ThomasHoffmann77! |
(created using
eb --new-pr
)