Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{lang,lib}[GCCcore/13.3.0] Python v3.12.3, libreadline v8.2, Tcl v8.6.14, libffi v3.4.5, SQLite v3.45.3 #20579

Merged

Conversation

SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member

…GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, Tcl-8.6.14-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, SQLite-3.45.3-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb, libffi-3.4.5-GCCcore-13.3.0.eb
@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
jscclxc1.int.jsc-clx.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, Intel Xeon Processor (Cascadelake) (cascadelake), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/SebastianAchilles/df53a146122ecc11ac2865efba55f1e7 for a full test report.

@lexming
Copy link
Contributor

lexming commented May 22, 2024

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@lexming: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=20579 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20579 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 13513

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2124821253 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
cns3 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/82648667f4bc21e4d2f6f2c50c0a01a4 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 22, 2024

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=20579 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_20579 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 4172

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 2125128428 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.4, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.18
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/5e27dc79ed0fa22601f2e40d715c7633 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 22, 2024

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 7 out of 7 (5 easyconfigs in total)
aarch64-neoverse-n1-node1.int.aws-rocky88-202310.eessi.io - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, AArch64, ARM UNKNOWN (neoverse_n1), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/ace855434ac0e95c47674cc08556f606 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented May 22, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bob-Latitude-5300 - Linux Ubuntu 22.04, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8665U CPU @ 1.90GHz, Python 3.10.12
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/eda5533ea3730bca33ef7dc3cae99474 for a full test report.

@bedroge
Copy link
Contributor

bedroge commented May 22, 2024

Test report by @bedroge
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
interactive1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.9, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/bedroge/21346f072c7482dcf45f6e5ab13cd6fe for a full test report.

@boegel boegel changed the title {lang,lib}[GCCcore/13.3.0] Python v3.12.3, libreadline v8.2, Tcl v8.6.14, ... {lang,lib}[GCCcore/13.3.0] Python v3.12.3, libreadline v8.2, Tcl v8.6.14, libffi v3.4.5, SQLite v3.45.3 May 22, 2024
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented May 22, 2024

Going in, thanks @SebastianAchilles!

@boegel boegel merged commit 44f51ba into easybuilders:develop May 22, 2024
9 checks passed
@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/a55d5e83886cb27c174716b59e6b9412 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

branfosj commented May 23, 2024

/usr/bin/install: cannot stat 'Modules/_tkinter.cpython-312-x86_64-linux-gnu.so': No such file or directory
make: *** [Makefile:2083: sharedinstall] Error 1

This is consistent with the issue I had in #20407 that lead me to adding Tk as a dep.

Though, confusingly, it is not impacting my build on all systems...

Fail when

checking for stdlib extension module _tkinter... yes

success when

checking for stdlib extension module _tkinter... missing

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0207u28a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9554 64-Core Processor (zen4), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/4b8e04e17cc03992124bf7dbf5ddb8ee for a full test report.

@SebastianAchilles
Copy link
Member Author

This is consistent with the issue I had in #20407 that lead me to adding Tk as a dep.

The problem with adding Tk as a dep would be that we would create a circular dependency chain:

libpciaccess/0.18.1 updated the build system to Meson, c.f. #20580

Python -> Tk, Tk -> X11, X11 -> libpciaccess, libpciaccess -> Meson, Meson -> Python

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
FAILED
Build succeeded for 4 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0211u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6248 CPU @ 2.50GHz (cascadelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/b7dc321df1c163eced9524cac36c0130 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0207u20a - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8480CL (sapphirerapids), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/b8a98586b72756db4692b59dcffc3138 for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

This is consistent with the issue I had in #20407 that lead me to adding Tk as a dep.

The problem with adding Tk as a dep would be that we would create a circular dependency chain:

libpciaccess/0.18.1 updated the build system to Meson, c.f. #20580

Python -> Tk, Tk -> X11, X11 -> libpciaccess, libpciaccess -> Meson, Meson -> Python

See #20630

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2024a issues & PRs related to 2024a common toolchains update
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants