Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{bio}[intel/2017b] deepTools v2.5.4 w/ Python 3.6.3 (+ deps) #5536

Merged

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Dec 18, 2017

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Dec 18, 2017

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 3 out of 3 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2499.golett.os - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/94670f9feb107a50d854f58b1476f45d for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
FAILED
Build succeeded for 0 out of 11 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
rescomp2 - Linux centos 6.8, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.11
See https://gist.github.com/92f73512580a0c462f116e0ca9f9a546 for a full test report.

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Test report by @verdurin
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 11 out of 11 (3 easyconfigs in this PR)
rescomp2 - Linux centos 6.8, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.11
See https://gist.github.com/76641ce4548653fe3c907098df5c81a9 for a full test report.

@verdurin verdurin added this to the 3.5.1 milestone Dec 18, 2017
Copy link
Member

@verdurin verdurin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks fine

@verdurin
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@verdurin verdurin merged commit 7405fa4 into easybuilders:develop Dec 18, 2017
@boegel boegel deleted the 20171218134102_new_pr_deepTools254 branch December 18, 2017 18:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants