Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add custom sanity_check_paths for GraphicsMagick consistently #5997

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2018
Merged

add custom sanity_check_paths for GraphicsMagick consistently #5997

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2018

Conversation

boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Mar 12, 2018

No description provided.

@boegel boegel added this to the 3.6.0 milestone Mar 12, 2018
@boegel boegel requested a review from verdurin March 12, 2018 18:01
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Mar 12, 2018

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in this PR)
node2025.delcatty.os - Linux centos linux 7.4.1708, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/49c1230ab2f6eb133a567cc8c77001c9 for a full test report.

vanzod
vanzod requested changes Mar 12, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@vanzod vanzod left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing checksums

@vanzod
Copy link
Member

vanzod commented Mar 12, 2018

Going in, thanks @boegel!

@vanzod vanzod merged commit 5cdfc21 into easybuilders:develop Mar 12, 2018
@boegel boegel deleted the GraphicsMagick_sanity_check branch March 13, 2018 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vanzod vanzod vanzod approved these changes

@verdurin verdurin Awaiting requested review from verdurin

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.6.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@boegel @vanzod