Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GEM-library_20130406-045632_pre-release-3_Linux-x86_64.eb #858

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 9, 2014
Merged

GEM-library_20130406-045632_pre-release-3_Linux-x86_64.eb #858

merged 3 commits into from Jun 9, 2014

Conversation

pescobar
Copy link
Member

@pescobar pescobar commented May 5, 2014

No description provided.

@fgeorgatos
Copy link
Contributor

looks good - and PR worked, too!

@fgeorgatos
Copy link
Contributor

SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1
Linux debian 6.0.9, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5640 @ 2.27GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/45424d283ef6e27f788f for a full test report.

@pescobar
Copy link
Member Author

pescobar commented Jun 4, 2014

Test report by @pescobar
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1
Linux centos 6.5, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/39c231fb756507d66496 for a full test report.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 9, 2014

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1
Linux SL 6.5, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz, Python 2.6.6
See https://gist.github.com/abf0ff56bc95b67e69b5 for a full test report.

boegel
boegel reviewed Jun 9, 2014
View reviewed changes
easybuild/easyconfigs/g/GEM-library/GEM-library_20130406-045632_pre-release-3_Linux-x86_64.eb

# only Linux_x86-64 binaries are provided so we skip build_step.
# We just use the MakeCp block to copy each file to the right destination folder (mainly the man files)
skipsteps = ['build']
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, this is becoming a pattern... maybe we need a dedicated easyblock for this type of thing?

this one seems awfully close to just using Tarball as easyblock though...

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 9, 2014

good to go, but we'll need to think about this emerging pattern, @pescobar?

boegel added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2014
@boegel
Merge pull request #858 from pescobar/GEM
e3001dd 
GEM-library_20130406-045632_pre-release-3_Linux-x86_64.eb
@boegel boegel merged commit e3001dd into easybuilders:develop Jun 9, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@pescobar @fgeorgatos @boegel