Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.6] Bug 391279: Add support for Unidirectional OneToMany with non-nullable value #239

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2018

Conversation

lukasj
Copy link
Member

@lukasj lukasj commented Sep 20, 2018

backport of #233 to 2.6

Signed-off-by: Will Dazey dazeydev.3@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Lukas Jungmann lukas.jungmann@oracle.com

@eclipsewebmaster
Copy link

Issue tracker reference:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=391279

1 similar comment
@eclipsewebmaster
Copy link

Issue tracker reference:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=391279

@dazey3
Copy link
Contributor

dazey3 commented Sep 20, 2018

Oh, I wasn't sure if we are still backporting to 2.6... are we planning on cutting a new 2.6 release at some point?

@lukasj
Copy link
Member Author

lukasj commented Sep 20, 2018

Yes, likely right after this PR. But generally speaking, only really important fixes should go into 2.6 (what gets to 2.6_WAS should get into 2.6 as well and vice-versa)

@dazey3
Copy link
Contributor

dazey3 commented Sep 20, 2018

I know we have a test bucket that was waiting for 2.6.6 (specifically Java support from Bug 525854) so I'll be looking to download :)

@dazey3
Copy link
Contributor

dazey3 commented Sep 26, 2018

@lukasj Do you want to use this PR to deliver your change to 2.6 or close and open a new one?

* Bug 391279: Add support for Unidirectional OneToMany with non-nullable value

Signed-off-by: Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Will
@lukasj
Copy link
Member Author

lukasj commented Sep 26, 2018

Let's reuse this one

@lukasj lukasj merged commit c39ba90 into eclipse-ee4j:2.6 Sep 26, 2018
@lukasj lukasj deleted the bug_391279_26 branch September 26, 2018 08:57
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants