Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Centralize model loading and GModel creation #96

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 4, 2021
Merged

Conversation

planger
Copy link
Member

@planger planger commented Dec 16, 2020

dseebacher pushed a commit to dseebacher/glsp-server that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2021
…ommunication (eclipse-glsp#73)

* eclipse-glsp#96 eclipse-glsp#94 Cleanup and refactor client-server communication

- Refactor client-server communication into a base protocol and a jsonrpc specific implementation (eclipse-glsp#94)
- Cleanup protocol and implement (previously unused) shutdown method
- Add ClientSessionManager to track lifecycle of GLSP client connections (eclipse-glsp#96)
- Add listener-mechanism to react to lifecycle changes (used in 
DefaultModelStateProvider)
- Remove (now obsolete) GLSPClientProxyProvider
- Fix wrong version of guava in org.eclipse.glsp.graph pom.xml
- Add unique applicationId to InitializeParameters

Part of:
- eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/94
- eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/96

* Fix minors

* Adapt copyright headers and fix checkstyle warnings

Co-authored-by: Philip Langer <planger@eclipsesource.com>
dseebacher pushed a commit to dseebacher/glsp-server that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2021
)

Also: 
- Use new clientProxy provider instead of deriving the proxy from the client id.
- Fix/Surpress a couple of warnings
- Sort members of MultiBindingDefaults

Follow up for eclipse-glsp/glsp/issues/96
dseebacher pushed a commit to dseebacher/glsp-server that referenced this pull request Jan 1, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@tortmayr tortmayr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks. Works great and code looks good to me apart from a few minors.

@planger
Copy link
Member Author

planger commented Jan 4, 2021

Thanks @tortmayr, I've updated the PR.

@tortmayr tortmayr self-requested a review January 4, 2021 10:55
Copy link
Contributor

@tortmayr tortmayr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@tortmayr tortmayr merged commit 88dda7d into master Jan 4, 2021
@tortmayr tortmayr deleted the planger/issues/119 branch January 4, 2021 10:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Generic entrypoint/class for transforming the semantic model into GModel representation
2 participants